US Farmland Increasingly Controlled by Foreign Investment | Civil Eats

US Farmland Increasingly Controlled by Foreign Investment

Foreign investment in American cropland has nearly tripled in the past decade, according to USDA data.

Foreign investment in U.S. cropland has nearly tripled in the past decade, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data.

The total cropland controlled by foreign interests in 2020 was 10.9 million acres, up from 4.1 million acres in 2010.

This growing level of investment has sparked legislative action. Currently, three bills before Congress would require additional review of foreign investment.

This increase has been largely driven by foreign-owned wind companies signing long-term leases on a large number of acres, according to the USDA. However, “the acres actually utilized by said companies are very few due to the small footprint of the wind towers erected on the land,” a USDA report said.

Foreign investors own more than just cropland. Overall, they own or lease nearly 37.6 million acres of agricultural land, including forests and pastures. That is an area slightly larger than the state of Illinois and makes up 2.9 percent of all privately held agricultural land in the U.S. This is up from a total of 24.2 million acres in 2010, according to the USDA.

Under the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act, all foreign holders of agricultural land—whether that is owners or long-term renters—must report those holdings to USDA.

State concentration of foreign holdings

This USDA graphic shows the concentration of foreign holdings of agricultural land in each state. Graphic is on page 10 of the PDF of the USDA’s 2020 AFIDA report.

Those reports are filed via a FSA-153 report. Each year, the USDA releases that information in an annual report, which shows where that investment is growing. Investigate Midwest obtained a database containing all of the information behind the USDA’s report. Although the USDA has released a 2020 report, the latest data available is through 2019.

The database has significant gaps. There are more than 3.1 million acres without an owner listed. Spot checks show that many parcels listed are no longer controlled by the owner in the database. It is unclear if land is removed from the database after it is sold or a lease is terminated.

While the database has significant errors and often has incomplete information, it still is a strong indicator of the quantity of land being sold or leased to foreign interests.

This growing level of investment has sparked legislative action. Currently, three bills before Congress would require additional review of foreign investment. Also, 14 states restrict or prohibit foreign ownership of farmland, though none outright forbid it, according to a November memo by the Congressional Research Service.

“If deep-pocketed investors come in, foreign or not, it drives up prices and makes it harder for new and beginning farmers to get started.”

Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, has been one of the leading voices concerned about foreign ownership of agricultural land. As a representative, Grassley helped write AFIDA, which became law in 1978, and has introduced the bipartisan Food Security is National Security Act during multiple sessions of Congress.

Grassley said that America’s young farmers will struggle to replace an aging farming population if farmland continues to become an investment.

“If deep-pocketed investors come in, foreign or not, it drives up prices and makes it harder for new and beginning farmers to get started,” Grassley said in a Q-and-A posted on his website.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

For years, Joe Maxwell has lobbied for more states to enact laws to monitor foreign investment in farmland. The president and cofounder of Farm Action, an advocacy group trying to counteract what it sees as an agricultural system that prioritizes corporations, he said AFIDA disclosures are unreliable.

“We have no confidence at the federal level that the law is working,” said Maxwell, a Democrat who formerly served as Lieutenant Governor of Missouri.

This USDA graphic shows the proportion of foreign-held agriculture land to all privately held agriculture land. Graphic is on page 10 of the PDF of USDA’s 2020 AFIDA report.

Maxwell said foreign investment, corporate investment, and investment by billionaires concerns him the most. He contends these entities aren’t looking at the production value of farmland. They view it as an investment, he said, which in turn drives up prices for farmers.

“We want everyone to think about, ‘Who do you want to be your farmer?'” Maxwell said. “If you’re happy with Bayer/Monsanto—a German corporation—being your farmer. Or Saudi Arabia. Or China. Then OK. But if you’re not OK with that, then you ought to care about this issue. We ought to make sure the next generation of farmers are individuals who will care for the land for future generations and care about producing safe and healthy food for their neighbors.”

Institutional investors, such as TIAA-CREF, have been increasingly investing in U.S. agricultural land. Many of the largest agricultural companies in the U.S. are foreign-owned. JBS, a Brazilian company, and Smithfield, owned by Chinese company WH Group, are two of the largest meat companies in the U.S. Bayer and BASF, two German companies, and Syngenta, owned by the state-owned Chinese chemical company, are also leading producers of seeds and agrochemicals.

The single largest corporations that control U.S. agricultural land are generally institutional investors of timberland.

According to the USDA’s database, Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018, owns at least 17,315 acres across 22 states and Puerto Rico. Syngenta owns at least 3,558 acres across 14 states. But the true figures may be higher. It can be difficult to track the exact number of acres owned by a corporation because of the number of holding companies with different names that many corporations have.

The largest holders of U.S. agriculture land are based in Canada (12.3 million acres), the Netherlands (4.9 million acres), and Italy (2.7 million acres). The single largest corporations that control U.S. agricultural land are generally institutional investors of timberland. Foreign renewable energy companies are also increasing their level of investment.

Foreign investment in agricultural land is split into five categories: forest, pasture, cropland, other ag, and non-ag. The largest category for foreign ownership is forest land. That is particularly true in the state of Maine, where 19.5 percent of agricultural land is controlled by foreign investors. This is largely due to foreign institutional investment in companies that own timberland.

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

In Hawaii, 9.2 percent of agricultural land (totaling 171,108 acres) is controlled by foreign investors. Of that, 42.6 percent is controlled by Japanese companies, while 27.3 percent is controlled by New Zealand investors, as of 2019. The figures for Midwestern states are considerably smaller. For instance, foreign investors control 2.6 percent of agricultural land in Illinois and 1.6 percent in Iowa.

In recent years, there has been a trend of foreign-owned energy companies leasing large swaths of land, fueled by federal tax credits.

Generally, when a wind turbine is on U.S. cropland, most of the acreage remains in production, surrounding a small area offset for the turbine structure and maintenance of the turbine.

Scott Chadde contributed data analysis.

This article originally appeared at Investigate Midwest, and is reprinted with permission.

Johnathan Hettinger is the enterprise reporter for the Midwest Center for Investigative Reporting, a nonprofit, online newsroom offering investigative and enterprise coverage of agribusiness, big ag, and related issues through data analysis, visualizations, in-depth reports and interactive web tools. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Liz
    Important information a must read.
  2. Doe this map include all multinational corporations?
  3. Marianne
    This means that foreign investors/entities may potentially be able to dictate which food, if any, will be grown in the U.S.
    Very different than outsourcing Christmas decorations !!!
  4. Susan Lea
    Great story and excellent information, and it would be helpful to report the hundreds of thousands of birds dying annually in the USA from windmills. Yes, 150 Bald Eagles killed by windmills, but vast numbers of other birds also killed.
  5. JP
    It is about DANG TIME someone looked into foreign ownership of AMERICAN SOIL....

More from

Food Policy

Featured

Popular

What the Rise of Craft Sake Says about Farming, Climate, and Culture

Nancy Matsumoto and the cover of her new book on japanese craft sake

A Zebra Mussel Invasion Threatens Irrigated Agriculture in the Northwest

Zebra Mussels on a pole. (Photo courtesy of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife

Oregon Adopts Nation’s Strongest Farmworker Protections for Heat and Wildfire Smoke

Farmworkers in the field in high heat and wildfire smoke

Op-ed: Climate Change Is Bringing Agriculture to the Arctic. Let’s Prioritize Food Sovereignty.

farming in alaska (Photo courtesy of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources)