Op-ed: The Pandemic Didn’t ‘End Hunger’—It Exposed Systemic Racism Instead | Civil Eats

Op-ed: The Pandemic Didn’t ‘End Hunger’—It Exposed Systemic Racism Instead

‘Food insecurity is not simply a money problem. It is also a racism problem.’

low angle view of african american man with scarf on face holding placard with racism is a pandemic lettering against blue sky

When the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Economic Research Service released its 2020 Household Food Security report last month, most media outlets reported that the overall percentage of food-insecure households remained unchanged at 10.5 percent since 2019. “Federal aid kept food insecurity in check,” read one headline. “Could COVID-19 finally end hunger in America?” read another, suggesting that through the emergency food assistance provided last year, we as a nation had somehow “learned how to keep families from going hungry.”

And yet, for some Americans, that couldn’t be further from the truth. During that same time, food insecurity increased for Black, non-Hispanic households—from 19.1 percent in 2019 to 21.7 percent in 2020, with an even higher jump among Black households in the South.

Even as the pandemic has added economic strain for many Americans, it has also underscored what has been true for several decades: Food insecurity is not simply a money problem. It is also a racism problem—a reality that many grassroots food justice organizations address head on in their activism and advocacy.

National policies that dictate how social welfare programs are funded or defunded are inextricably linked to race and racism. After more than a decade of research on food safety net programs and food banks, anthropologist Maggie Dickinson reported in 2019 that the number of people enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) had rapidly increased since 2001, and that the primarily Black and Latinx families seeking assistance were often met with suspicion and disdain.

Programs that were designed to be temporary fixes are primary lifelines for many families in the U.S., but those lifelines are increasingly strained by lack of resources, increasing caseloads, and political lobbying that insists on painting poor and working-class people as burdens to the state.

Attacks on federal programs like SNAP, for example, can be tied directly back to Reagan-era myths about so-called “welfare queens”—imagined as Black and often unmarried with children—that siphon precious resources from the public. This cultural figure has on-the-ground implications. The trope of a Black woman stealing resources from the government so captured the public imagination that it fueled mandatory drug testing policies that resulted in millions of dollars wasted and former President Trump’s proposal to cut SNAP funding by replacing some cash benefits with prepackaged shelf-stable food boxes.

Black communities’ fight for high-quality, accessible food is also a part of the fight against the anti-Black racism that shapes city planning and design, housing, wages, and education—all factors that impact food insecurity well before one goes out in search of groceries. My own research in Washington, D.C. found that Black residents not only have fewer grocery stores or supermarkets in close proximity compared to white residents, but they also reported that the stores near them were not well-maintained and offered products of lower quality.

The decades-long battle to imagine and create food legislation that preserves the health, well-being, and dignity of aid recipients is no less continuous now than it was when Reagan first uttered the words “welfare queen.” It is clear that SNAP benefits do not solve food insecurity, nor do they shield recipients from discrimination or stereotypes associated with receiving public aid.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

In August, the Biden administration announced historic changes to SNAP that will increase aid to 42 million recipients beginning in October. Still, the average monthly increase in benefits will be just $36. Research suggests that the average recipient runs out of money by mid-month, so it remains to be seen whether the policy change will actually impact hunger or quality of life.

What we need are visions for food security that address hunger in ways that preserve dignity, provide high-quality food regardless of race or income, and fight against racialized stereotypes of laziness and theft. Though the public fight against food insecurity is most often waged through policies that are marred and shaped by anti-Blackness, some of the most transformative work happens at the grassroots level, led by members of the Black community.

I am inspired by the ways neighbors pool together resources for meals and rides to grocery stores. Organizations like the National Black Food and Justice Alliance, the Black Church Food Security Network in Baltimore, Soil Generation in Philadelphia, and Dreaming Out Loud in Washington, D.C. address food insecurity and anti-Blackness through growing food and advocating for redistribution of resources such that community needs are met with care.

They follow in the tradition of organizing and mutual aid that led Fannie Lou Hamer to start Freedom Farms Cooperative and the Black Panther Party to offer free breakfast to children and groceries to families. These efforts are often grassroots and hyperlocal, but they make a difference. Their visions are often far more capacious, loving, and radical than what is espoused by public policy.

newsmatch mobile logo

Their visions and the ways they have responded to crises during the COVID-19 pandemic give me hope that we can eradicate food insecurity. The answer lies not primarily or only in policy change, but in the power of community-led and community-centered organizing that links food insecurity to larger structural forces like anti-Blackness. In doing so, these organizers fight for a better world in which all parts of us—mind, body, spirit—are safe and well nourished.

Ashanté M. Reese is an Assistant Professor of African and African Diaspora Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. Reese works at the intersection of critical food studies and Black geographies, examining the ways Black people produce and navigate food-related spaces. Animated by the question, who and what survives, Reese’s work has focused on the everyday strategies Black people employ while navigating inequity. Her first book, Black Food Geographies: Race, Self-Reliance, and Food Access in Washington, D.C., takes up these themes through an ethnographic exploration of antiblackness and food access. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More from

Food Policy

Featured

Popular

Could a Rapid Test For Antibiotics Bring Transparency to the Meat Supply Chain?

Packaged pieces of meat on a supermarket showcase

After Years of Pushing for Prairie Strips, This Ecologist Won a MacArthur ‘Genius’ Grant

Lisa Schulte Moore. (Photo credit: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation)

University Ag Schools Turn to Big Ag Dollars as Private Donations Dry Up

Meet the African Farmer Growing Rice in New York’s Hudson Valley

Nfamara's son Malick, center, with Naveen and Malaya Hoyte, Malick's cousins. (Photo by Jake Price)