On-Farm Solar Grows as Farmers See Economic Rewards—and Risks | Civil Eats

On-Farm Solar Grows as Farmers See Economic Rewards—and Risks

From struggling dairy operations to massive grain operations, farms are starting to see the light as on-farm solar proves to be an important income stream.

Kelly Placke of Star Bright Farms in Cuba City, Wisconsin.

Steve Pierson switched from raising conventional dairy cows in confinement to grazing the animals on organic pasture for a simple reason: they kept getting sick. He had heard and read about the fact that cows that ate grass had healthier immune systems, since their bodies are designed to digest grasses, not the grain used as feed at most dairies. The transition did make the cows live longer, and he also began to notice other environmental benefits, such as healthier soil and more perennial grasses.

“I didn’t understand at that point the far-reaching benefits that [grazing] can have…and it started me on this journey to sustainability,” he said. “That’s what led us to investigating solar and sustainable energy practices on our farm.”

Pierson runs his organic farm in Saint Paul, Oregon, 30 miles south of Portland, with his wife and three children. He’s a member (and sits on the board) of the national dairy co-op Organic Valley, and the family’s farm is one of about 350 within the co-op’s network of more than 2,000 farms that has installed solar energy systems. Organic Valley says it is helping its member-owners install solar because it’s a relatively easy win-win scenario—a means for farmers to bring costs down amid a bleak farm economy while simultaneously reducing fossil fuel consumption. [Disclosure: Organic Valley has been a supporter of Civil Eats in the past.]

Steve Pierson of Organic Valley with his family.

Steve Pierson of Organic Valley with his family.

Organic Valley’s goal is to triple the number of farmers it helps with solar installations over the next few years. It has dedicated staff members supporting farmers as they navigate the installation process and access grants; company staff have been in Washington, D.C. advocating for an extension to the federal tax credits that help farmers afford the upfront cost.

The company’s efforts aren’t happening in a vacuum. Although the solar energy industry and agriculture have been at odds in the past due to competition for valuable farmland, there appears to be new momentum behind a push toward installing more solar panels on farms. (There is also growing interest in agrivoltaics, dual-use solar installations in which crops grow and animals graze below and around panels, but those systems are much less common.)

According to the 2017 Census of Agriculture, the number of farms with solar panels increased nearly 150 percent between 2012 and 2017, from 36,000 to 90,000. Even American Farmland Trust (AFT), an organization dedicated to preserving agricultural land, is promoting agriculture and solar “co-location.” AFT just hosted an event last month for Long Island farmers called, “Combating Climate Change: Solar Energy, Farming, and the Future in New York.”

“Renewable energy is a natural fit for America’s farmlands. When you put a solar array or wind turbine on a farm, it pays dividends both economically and environmentally,” said Gregory Wetstone, president and CEO of the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE). “We’re just scratching the surface of the partnership potential.”

Planting (and Paying for) Panels

“The commitment to sustainability is waking up before the sun and farming in a way that supports ecosystems—and solar has been part of our on-farm work for years,” said Stanley Minnick, Organic Valley’s energy services and technology manager, during a presentation at the Solar Energy Industries Association conference in November. Minnick was at the event to present the results of a project the company had completed at its corporate headquarters. After installing solar panels on three rooftops, investing in both solar and wind farms, and forming creative alliances, the company’s operations are now powered by 100 percent renewable energy.

Stanley Minnick of Organic Valley standing in front of a new solar panel system.

Stanley Minnick of Organic Valley

But with a network of dairy farms across the country, Organic Valley’s energy footprint is much greater across the supply chain. Which is why, Minnick said, the co-op committed to helping farms evaluate, implement, and afford solar systems several years earlier.

“We’ve had a formal sustainability program for over 10 years and it really did start with renewable energy,” Nicole Rakobitsch, Organic Valley’s sustainability manager, told Civil Eats. Rakobitsch oversees an on-farm solar team, which reaches out to member farms and educates them about the opportunity to install solar arrays on their farms. Team members also offer technical assistance around what size system is appropriate, conducts site assessments, and more. They can also help farmers tally costs and write grants for programs like the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP).

That piece is crucial for small and medium-scale farmers because the up-front installation costs are so high. And while many farmers are struggling to make ends meet, the economic situation is especially dire for those in dairy.

Pierson initially installed three ground-mounted 10-kilowatt systems on his farm, on land he wasn’t able to use for grazing, for a total cost of $120,000. But energy credits he got from the Oregon nonprofit Energy Trust, plus a federal grant and state and federal tax credits, brought that cost down significantly. Now, he estimates that the system generates about 50 percent of the farm’s electricity, effectively cutting his annual bill in half. Pierson was so happy with the results that he built a much larger 260-kilowatt solar system on his second farm, where he grows forage for the cows on about 700 acres. That system generates about 90 to 95 percent of the farm’s electricity.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

While the numbers vary based on the type and size of farm, according to a 2016 USDA report, most farms’ electricity costs account for about 2 to 4 percent of their overall costs (with the exception of small and medium-sized poultry farms and large peanut farms, which are significantly higher). That means saving on electric won’t make a massive dent in overall costs, making incentives and credits to cover the upfront cost more important to adoption.

It’s why Minnick, after the industry event, lobbied elected officials for an extension of the solar investment tax credit (ITC), a 30 percent credit that is set to begin lowering incrementally in 2020. Advocates like ACORE’s Wetstone say the credit has dramatically increased the adoption of solar energy across the U.S. since its creation in 2005.

chart showing the annual growth of US solar installations

Chart courtesy of SEIA. (Click image for larger version)

For some farmers, however, the tax credit isn’t solar energy’s most attractive financial benefit. Shane Hughes left his job in finance to start Liberty Delight Farms in Reisterstown, Maryland, 10 years ago. Hughes produces pasture-raised beef, pork, chicken, and other meats on 100 acres and grows his own feed nearby, on another 400 acres. When he decided to build a new barn in 2015, a neighbor approached him about installing solar on the roof, and he engineered the building from the ground up to support the panels. Like Pierson, Hughes saw a connection between the way he was farming and the need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.

“It made sense in terms of sticking to our model of doing our part to help and preserve the environment,” Hughes said.

The financial benefit he was hoping for, however, didn’t pan out as he expected. Hughes was able to apply some property tax credits to buy his system, which produces about 80 to 85 percent of the farm’s electricity, significantly cutting down on his roughly $1,200 monthly electric bill. However, he was banking on benefitting from Maryland’s Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) market to help pay off his solar array. States with SREC markets require energy companies to get a portion of their electricity from solar. Those companies can produce that energy on their own or buy SRECs from individuals producing solar.

Sheep grazing around solar panels in Cashton, Wisconsin.

Sheep grazing around solar panels.

When Hughes installed his system, SRECs in Maryland were rarer and extremely valuable; he estimated the payback period on his installation was about 12 years, with those SRECs factored into to the payback. But as more solar panels were installed across the state, the number of SRECs grew and their individual value plummeted. Now, he says he’s looking at a payback period of more than 20 years.

“If our government would force the utility companies to purchase more renewable energy, it would increase the value of SRECs, and I’d be more of a proponent of it,” he said.

Commodity crop farmers in other states are also increasingly renting their land out to energy companies to build large solar installations that sell energy back to the grid. According to the Washington Post, hundreds in Illinois have applied to host acres of panels on their farms to help the state meet its renewable energy goals. This approach is much more lucrative than simply cutting energy costs on the farm, but it’s also controversial since it often involves taking fertile farmland out of production.

A Sunny Political Future?

The experiences of farmers in Maryland and Illinois point to a reality that is shaking out across the agricultural landscape. Right now, the most impactful action on environmental policy is happening at the state level.

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

“There’s no question that smart state policies have been critical to accelerating the deployment of renewable power,” said Wetstone, who cited a survey ACORE released earlier this year. In the survey, renewable energy investors cited “expanded state renewable portfolio standards” as a top reason for optimism on the continued growth of renewables over the next three years.

For farmers looking to install solar, what they have access to in terms of grants, tax credits, and SREC markets varies significantly state to state.

Still, advocates are pushing hard for the extension of the federal ITC extension. At the end of November, House Democrats released a draft of a tax package called the GREEN (Growing Renewable Energy and Efficiency Now) Act, which would continue the 30 percent credit through 2024, with incremental reductions after that. At this point, it’s unclear whether that credit will make its way into year-end tax legislation.

Stanley Minnick, for one, is continuing to push for the policy, while Organic Valley works to help more farmers assess their solar prospects and manage the on-the-ground (or on-the-roof) logistics.

“We talk about how many farms we’re losing every year, and this is one more piece of the puzzle,” he said. “I had a farmer once who said to me, ‘Stanley, this project, it’s like giving myself a $500 raise.’ That’s a car payment. That matters to a small farm, especially.”

All photos courtesy of Organic Valley. Top photo: Kelly Placke of Star Bright Farms in Cuba City, Wisconsin.

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Since 2015, she has reported on agriculture and the food system with an eye toward sustainability, equality, and health, and her stories have appeared in publications including The Guardian, The Washington Post, and Mother Jones. In the past, she covered health and wellness and was an editor at Well+Good. She is based in Baltimore and has a master's degree from Columbia University's School of Journalism. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Hi ?, one of your favorite customers, this is absolutely wonderful! I’m so happy to hear and see the wonderful benefits your making for our animals and the quality of care you put into producing awesome ? products! Your compassion and humanity for animals is outstanding especially coming from a family owned and operated business, keep up the fantastic work!! ???????
  2. Terry E Simms
    Currently, farmers are paid to take some of their tillable acreage out of production in any event so it makes sense to remove them for a longer period of time, up to 20 or 30 years, and install a crop of solar collectors to produce power instead of food. I know from direct experience on several large solar collection systems that solar production from the current generation of solar systems is surprisingly stable over time, even in the semi-marine coastal weather of the mid-Atlantic region. Even though they do not produce power 24 hours per day, they have the advantage over food production in that they produce power 12 months per year. Farmers engaged in food production have to work 3 months to produce a single crop simultaneously with all the other farmers across the country at a time when demand is low and supply s high. Solar power (left unfettered in a free market), is produced and sold continuously though out the year and as a result, solar farming is less risky.
  3. Anthony Owen
    Great job and I'm an Organic Valley happy customer.
  4. There must have been a mistake in your article a 10 kw system would never cost 120 thousand
  5. John Bennett
    Great work!! Help for us all.
  6. Hey folks! Get involved in solar grazing!
    Our team here at the American Solar Grazing Association - a farmer-led initiative to get good deals for farmers and connect them with solar - helped the team at Organic Valley get the grazing organized on this site.
    Learn more and support what we do at www.solargrazing.org
  7. Tom Xu
    Very insightful and informative article.

More from




Can Cooking in Community Slow Dementia and Diabetes?

Can Seaweed Save American Shellfish?

Donna Collins-Smith hauls out kelp lines for the Shinnecock Kelp Farmers on Shinnecock Bay. (Photo credit: Rebecca Phoenix)

The Promise and Possible Pitfalls of American Kelp Farming

an illustration by nhatt nichols showing a hand pulling a kelp line out of the sea

A US Court Found Chiquita Guilty of Murder in Colombia. What Does the Ruling Mean for Other U.S. Food Corporations Abroad?

Workers unload green bananas for washing at the Santa Cruz banana plantation in Ciudad Hidalgo, Chiapas, Mexico. The fruit from the plantation in the Mexican state of Chiapas is harvested year round and shipped to clients in Mexico and the United States, incluiding Chiquita, the leading American banana distributor. (Photo credit: John Moore/Getty Images)