What the New Green Deal Means for the Food on Your Plate | Civil Eats

What the New Green Deal Means for the Food on Your Plate

The long-awaited policy proposal from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ed Markey has finally surfaced—and it aims to turn U.S. agriculture into a positive force for climate change and social justice.

Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey during the introduction of the Green New Deal resolutions.

Today, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) released their much-anticipated Green New Deal with the goal of creating millions of jobs by expanding renewable energy and de-carbonizing the economy over the next 10 years.

It’s a sweeping attempt to reorient energy production and shift public resources in an urgent bid to make the U.S. carbon-neutral by 2030. And it comes at a crucial moment, as dire scientific evidence shows the world needs to act fast over the next 12 years to avert the worst impacts of climate change.

Food and agriculture, which is responsible for 9 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions, is included in several aspects of the 14-page House Resolution released by Ocasio-Cortez today. Primarily, the resolution notes the importance of “working collaboratively with farmers and ranchers in the United States to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector” through  supporting family farming; “investing in sustainable farming and land use practices that increase soil health”; and “building a more sustainable food system that ensures universal access to healthy food.”

The need for a food-system overhaul also gets a shout-out in the closing line of the resolution, which notes that the projects required by a Green New Deal will include “providing all people of the United States with … access to clean water, clean air, healthy and affordable food, and nature.”

Agriculture’s presence in the Green New Deal is the result of a palpable urgency that has emerged in food and farming movements to make sure that the effort not only reduces industrial agriculture’s massive carbon emissions, but also transforms a host of environmental problems and inequities embedded in how America’s food is produced.

“The Green New Deal sets a bold vision for dealing with the climate change crisis, which will soon escalate into a full-blown disaster if we don’t make the kinds of changes outlined in this plan. There are many good ideas in this resolution, but this is just the first step in the process,” Representative Chellie Pingree (D-ME) said in a statement to Civil Eats. “There is a lot of work to be done in the days ahead to iron out the details, like opportunities to work with farmers to trap more carbon in the soil. But I’m confident that we can pass something in the House and send it to the Senate, because the American people have demanded action.”

Sustainable agriculture advocates have been urging the food movement to “get behind the Green New Deal” and support major reforms of America’s food and farming system. Over 100 scientists, researchers, and other food systems experts have also signed onto a letter to that effect penned by the Agroecology Research-Action Collective. The future they envision puts U.S. agriculture at the center of the action on climate.

“We need stop the industrial overproduction of food—the root cause of agricultural pollution, food waste and greenhouse gas emissions,” argues Eric Holt-Giménez, executive director of Food First. One step in this direction would be supply management and guaranteed minimum prices for farmers, Holt-Giménez says—what’s known in the farming world as “parity” pricing. He says this type of minimum wage for farmers could stabilize many struggling small growers while discouraging the culture of “get big or get out.” “This way, we eliminate food waste and resource waste at the point of production, capture carbon, and ensure decent livelihoods for farmers and farm workers,” he adds.

Why Include Food?

Many advocates argue that America’s food system is ripe for a comprehensive overhaul toward sustainability and equity. Today’s meat and dairy operations emit millions of tons of climate-altering methane and nitrous oxide gases, while vast corn and soy farms rely on fossil fuel-based pesticides and synthetic fertilizers to grow livestock feed and auto fuel. This system is propped up by more than $13 billion a year in subsidies and crop insurance, while small farmers receive minimal support and no guarantee of a fair price in an increasingly concentrated, anti-competitive market; more than 12,000 farmers go out of business each year. Large-scale farms receive ample backing, while public monies for organic, regenerative, and small-scale diversified farming are minimal. This food chain depends on low-wage, often undocumented workers.

“There is a renewed energy to think big, and we need to apply this thinking to reforming our food system.” Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) told Civil Eats by email. A Green New Deal, he added, “could implement some incredibly common-sense provisions to reduce the climate impacts of farming, like improving and doubling the funding for existing conservation programs.”

The resolution introduced on February 7th certainly describes a revolution in how the economy operates, and whom it benefits. But in order for that vision to become reality, the legislation that follows will need to be equally ambitious, if it’s to begin turning the ship around on our nation’s approach agriculture.

To that end, Rep. Blumenauer plans to reintroduce his Food and Farm Act, a sweeping alternative farm bill that proposes, among other things, to “help producers adapt to a changing and unpredictable climate and increase resiliency to climate change impacts, including rising temperatures and extreme weather events, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) is also preparing Green New Deal legislation, according to spokesperson Martina McLennan. Merkley plans to fight for a measure that “provides incentives, technical assistance, and funding to support low-carbon farming, water and soil conservation, and sustainable agriculture.” Despite ample scientific literature showing that producing less meat and dairy is central to tackling carbon emissions, any congressional challenge to the meat and dairy industries—powerful groups with massive lobbying might—will undoubtedly see pushback. The EPA has been prevented from reporting livestock emissions since 2008.

“I want to talk about the impact that concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) have on the environment and what we can do to mitigate it,” said Blumenauer. “We shouldn’t be incentivizing them through programs like the Environmental Quality Incentives Program; we should be forcing them to pay for the damage they cause to the environment and public health.”

Political Roadblocks Ahead

Given the December passage of a new farm bill that largely maintains support for industrial agriculture, and the general political gridlock in Washington, it will be an uphill push to secure a Green New Deal that includes major food system reforms. Proponents won’t just face resistance from the meat and dairy industries; entrenched interests in every aspect of the food system are likely to oppose sweeping changes.

As Holt-Giménez explained to Civil Eats, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s original New Deal in the early 1930s started with food and agriculture. The Green New Deal, Holt-Giménez argues, “needs to be much more Rooseveltian.”

However, Green New Deal proponents will face both the entrenched opposition in the Republican Party as well as obstacles within the Democratic Party. For instance, after Ocasio-Cortez pushed the issue to the forefront last December, Democratic leaders put a halt to her select committee idea, instead opting to revive a climate committee that lacked any legislative powers.

Democrats on the House Agriculture Committee did not return requests for comment by press time, but Rep. Collin Peterson, the Democratic chair of the committee, has also been downplaying the importance of climate action in the House. Peterson expressed his skepticism recently to reporters, asking, “What is our goal? Planting all those trees? I’m actually cutting down the forest,” he said, referring to a recent logging project on his Minnesota farmland.

The Green New Deal sponsors have been hearing from food and agriculture advocates, including Blumenauer, for the last several months. In January, Saikat Chakrabarti, chief of staff for Ocasio-Cortez, said: “Transitioning to sustainable, locally focused, ecologically responsible agriculture that drastically reduces greenhouse gases will be a crucial part of implementing a Green New Deal.”

Similarly, Sunrise Movement spokesperson Stephen O’Hanlon told Civil Eats that agriculture is on their radar, noting, “We need to require large agricultural companies to adopt ecologically sound practices and support small farmers to transition.”

The Bigger Picture

Beyond immediate legislation, a cornucopia of food, farming, indigenous and climate justice groups are pushing to transform food production. Climate justice groups including the Indigenous Environment Network are backing a broader vision that incorporates food justice and sovereignty. A “just transition” must support community food sovereignty, the coalition argues, including “a restorative framework for indigenous-based policy reform in hunting, fishing and gathering rights and forestry, fisheries, rangeland, environmental conservation, health, agriculture, and rural and community development.”

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

In a letter sent to Ocasio-Cortez and other members of Congress, Holt-Giménez, Elizabeth Henderson of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, John Peck of Family Farm Defenders, and Professor Anthony Robert Pahnke of San Francisco State University, called for “a just transition” to a system that “promotes agroecological practices that build soil carbon, protect air and water quality, and enhance biodiversity.” A Green New Deal, they added, “must include policies that enable family farmers to remain viable on their own land,” while “guaranteeing a living wage for all those engaged in the food/farm system.”

Time and politics will tell how far the Green New Deal can go, as the long fight over food, land, and resources continues, and the climate survival clock keeps ticking.

Update: on February 7, the same day the resolution was announced, the New York Times reported that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has “no plan to bring the resolution in its current form to the floor for a vote,”  according to a Pelosi aide.

Top photo: Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey during today’s introduction of the Green New Deal resolutions (photo courtesy of Rep. Chellie Pingree).

Christopher D. Cook is an award-winning journalist whose writing also appears in the Los Angeles Times, Harper’s, Mother Jones, The Atlantic, The Nation, The Economist, and elsewhere. He is the author of Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis. Contact him through www.christopherdcook.com. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. What exactly will this mean for my plate? I don't see specifics here about how our food supply will change or what this will mean for consumers.
    • Pojimogo
      It means your plate will often be empty. Our food supply will be unsustainable as current population numbers will strain a now compromised agricultural infrastructure. Pestilence, famine, disease and death will become common place. The concept of "consumers" will no longer exist as society will degenerate into a dark ages barbarism.
  2. I think this is a great plan. We are running out of time on this planet and changing our evil ways might slow it down or stop it. The only problem is that the Republicans and others will not agree.
  3. Jack Wood
    The problem with the GND is that it has no basis in reality. Reality is that using natural gas to make ammonia for fertilizer and oil to make pesticides gives us yields averaging 170 bushels of corn per acre. Without those, yields will quickly fall to about 14 bushels per acre. The GND is a suicide pact.
  4. Graybull
    WOW............."food justice".......just what I have been dreaming of........all my life. Then I read some more and it gets even better.........

    "guaranteed minimum prices for farmers".

    Let me know and I can send my address so you can send me a check or checks.
  5. Timothy O'Dell
    Massive outreach to and organizing of a base of the marginalized and powerless will be required, especially to & of a lumpen proletariat that does not know its opportunities, has given up and never votes. There isn't an alternative, however. Why? Because atmosphere - soil - plant cover, and the IS the foundational and limiting resource for all else. Prevailing sicknesses of carbon, and especially, water cycling are no longer to ignore. Just ask Houston, New Orleans and all of North Carolina and Vermont.
  6. Paula Franklin
    I truly hope she intends to overhaul the Farm Bill.
  7. Leonstarkman
    Good notes
  8. Eleanor K Shive
    Thank you. My heart breaks for the millions of citizens who are suffering due to toxicity in our environment and in our food. The suffering of animals being raised in tortuous conditions and who present health risks to the consumer.
    Our farmlands are controlled by corporate interests to feed their pocket books not to feed the world.
    I appreciate your efforts, and we will continue to vote with our dollars.
    Our government subsidizes corporations. It is no longer concerned regards the health and well being of the American people.
  9. Kent Norman
    These people need to get out of NYC and see how the real world is and not imagined in their mind! They have no clue about farming or cattle raising!
  10. Stephen Parks
    The authors carefully avoided mentioning the cost changes in the GND. As mentioned in earlier comments, production per acre will fall dramatically if synthetic fertilizer and pesticides are reduced. That means (surprise!) that many more acres that are now wild, would be pressed into service as cropland. Bye Bye trees.
    And by the way, since the cost of food will skyrocket, we'll need a lot more subsidies and food stamps.
    I'm all for re-examining public policy, such as mining and permits on public land, and research on how to reduce dependence on pesticides.
    But a panicky response to an iffy alleged threat is wholly unwarranted.
  11. Kris Oluich
    As a second generation Organic farmer who actually makes a decent living farming I think that I’m qualified to comment on this matter.
    One reform is needed; not this spiderweb of ideas from someone who’s never farmed. Stop all farm subsidies within five years and let the chips fall where they may.
    The smart farmers will figure out what they need to do to attain viability. The others will die off (as they should). We need to end this system of financial unsustainability once and for all.
  12. Timmy
    It's an ok start, but...

    The word 'sustainable' needs to be retired, especially in the agricultural (read: soil) context. As Gabe Brown says, "Why would we want to sustain a degraded resource?" The answer is that we wouldn't.

    Rather, we would want to *regenerate* it -- or bring life back to it and/or it back to life. And we can do that, 'countrywide' and eventually worldwide, using the best practices of regenerative agriculture. In so doing, many of the other laudable goals of the GND will be accomplished.

    Someone needs to bring AOC and the authors of the GND up to speed.
  13. Chris Murray
    Another foolish socialist trope. This crap is coming from Chinese spies that lurk in our universities corrupting our children's minds with socialist fantasies. Socialism has never worked. Capitalism is the force that has lifted billions out of poverty over the past 50 years. Even in China, the force that lifted the Conmmies out of poverty was capitalism. Socialism retreated after its failure virtually everywhere it has been tried. The green dream or whatever it's called is nothing more than the same old watermelon these foolish children have been peddling for generations - green on the outside, red on the inside. Don't be a fool, reject the GND on its face, and reject those peddling this tripe.
  14. george pilling
    So-called Industrial Agriculture has been a disaster for our food supply system, our environment, our public health and our economy. Existing "agricultural policy" is essentially government support for agra-business interests and antithetical to small farmers and sustainable, ecologically sound farming practices. It is long past time that we actually focus on this critically important issue, and address it in an effective way. The Green New Deal is a first step in the right direction.
  15. james roberts
    How about full subsidies for small organic farms for families to create a new and vibrant food economy as well?
  16. Julie Castro-Orozco
    ¡Adelante amiga! Estoy contigo.

More from




Zero-Waste Grocery Stores in Growth Mode as Consumers Seek to Ditch Plastic

Inside a re_ grocery store in the Mar Vista neighborhood of Los Angeles. (Photo courtesy of re_grocery)

Can AI Help Cut Plastic Waste From the Food System?

Restaurants Create a Mound of Plastic Waste. Some Are Working to Fix That.

What Happened to Antibiotic-Free Chicken?

hickens gather around a feeder at a farm on August 9, 2014 in Osage, Iowa. Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images