Fast Food Consumption Linked with More Toxic Chemicals | Civil Eats

If You Eat Fast Food You’re Getting a Generous Helping of Toxic Chemicals

New study shows that consumption of fast food is linked to higher levels of phthalates, the chemicals used to produce many plastics.

Fast Food, Potentially Containing Phthalates

Most busy Americans have a powerful push-pull relationship with fast food. While they may know the facts—most fast food is high in fat, salt, and sugar and can lead to increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, and obesity—they still eat a lot of it. According to a 2013 Gallup poll, eight in 10 Americans report eating at fast food restaurants at least monthly, with almost half said they eat it at least weekly.

Now, a new study may add fuel to the anti-fast food fire. It suggests that people who eat fast food regularly are being exposed to significantly higher levels of hormone-disrupting chemicals called phthalates. These findings raise concerns because phthalates have been linked to a range of adverse effects including impacts on reproductive, behavioral, and respiratory health.

Published today in Environmental Health Perspectives, the study, conducted by researchers at George Washington University, looked at fast food consumption by nearly 9,000 people and found that those who reported eating more of it in the past day had urinary phthalate levels as much as 40 percent higher than those who had eaten no fast food in the 24 hours before testing.

“This is the largest study of its kind to examine if a certain type of food preparation is associated with levels of these chemicals in the body,” the study’s lead author Ami Zota, assistant professor of environmental and occupational health at George Washington University, told Civil Eats.

The study asked about 8,900 people participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2003 and 2010 what they had eaten in 24 hours before having their urine tested for the breakdown products of two phthalates: di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and diisononyl phthalate (DiNP).

The researchers also calculated how much fast food-related fat people had consumed and recorded what type of food people had eaten: meat, dairy, grain, eggs, etc. The results showed clearly that people with the highest fast food consumption had 23.8 percent higher levels of metabolized DEHP in their urine and 39 percent higher levels of metabolized DiNP.

Higher fat, meat, and grain consumption was also linked with higher phthalate levels but over all, the results “suggest a bigger relationship between phthalates and the fast food,” Zota explained. The findings connecting phthalate exposure with food are supported by many previous studies that have examined phthalate levels in different types of food.

A Ubiquitous Chemical

Phthalates are used extensively in plastics, including food packaging and processing equipment, medical equipment, flooring, toys, and countless other consumer products. They’ve also been used as preservatives in synthetic fragrances and in personal care products and cosmetics, including lotions, nail polishes, shampoos, deodorant, and baby wipes to name but a few. Phthalates can migrate out of all these products and can be inhaled, absorbed through skin, and ingested. Phthalates are so widely used that scientists consider them “ubiquitous” and the CDC has found them in the bodies of well over 90 percent of Americans tested.

In animal studies certain phthalates have been shown to interfere with the male reproductive system. Many studies have linked phthalate exposure to adverse reproductive, respiratory, and neurobehavioral health effects in children and to increased risk for metabolic disease. Based on concerns among medical and public health professionals, a number of phthalates are now barred from use in children’s products by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. While different phthalates can produce different health effects, the two phthalates tracked in this study are considered endocrine disrupters and associated with these effects.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

As Zota explains, the study defined fast food as the CDC does, including not only the big chains like McDonald’s, Burger King, and Wendy’s, but also at other restaurants without table service and grab-and-go food like prepared sandwiches or pastries at Starbucks, or slices of pizza, burritos, and noodles. The exposures appeared to apply equally to McDonald’s and Burger King and to higher-end fare at Starbucks and “casual dining” restaurants, she said.

Also notable, says Zota, is the diversity of the participants, who ranged in age from six to 80 and included a full range of socio-economic, racial, and ethnic groups. Age was the only of these factors that made a difference—the exposures were highest in teens and adults and lowest in children—likely reflecting patterns of eating, Zota and colleagues noted.

Where are the Phthalates Coming From?

While the study did not investigate the initial sources of phthalates measured, previous research suggests that these chemicals are associated with food packaging, preparation, storage, processing equipment—including dairy tubing—and even the vinyl gloves some food industry workers wear, Zota explains. “There’s a myriad of sources,” she says. “It’s most likely the more processed the food the more opportunities [for phthalate exposure.]”

How important are these exposures? “No studies in humans have found a safe level of phthalate exposure,” says New York University School of Medicine associate professor of pediatrics and environmental medicine Leo Trasande, who did not participate in this study but has researched phthalates in food. “We know there are effects of low level exposure,” he says. For example, the levels found in this new study are comparable to those previously linked to blood pressure increases and metabolic effects in children.

The chemical industry has refuted such findings and maintains that phthalates are safe, and do not easily migrate from products. According to the American Chemistry Council—whose members include BASF, Bayer, Dow, DuPont, and over 100 other chemical companies—the presence of phthalates in people does not indicate health concerns.

What’s the Bottom Line?

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

Many scientists and clinicians are increasingly recommending limiting exposure to hormone-disrupting chemicals like phthalates, especially among vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women, young children, and those going through puberty, among others, explains Zota. And given that a great many people regularly eat the kind of quick meals this study focuses on—about one third of the study’s participants—the evidence may point to one more reason to eat less fast food.

“It speaks to the general concern we’ve long had about food regulations and permissible amounts of chemicals as food additives,” both those added intentionally and those than can creep in from food contact materials, says Trasande. It also “adds further evidence for eating fresh food and avoided pre-processed and packaged food.”


Elizabeth Grossman was a senior reporter for Civil Eats from 2014 to 2017, where she focused on environmental and science issues. She is the author of Chasing Molecules, High Tech Trash, Watershed and other books. Her work appeared in a variety of publications, including National Geographic News, The Guardian, The Intercept, Scientific American, Environmental Health Perspectives, Yale e360, Ensia, High Country News, The Washington Post, Salon, The Nation, and Mother Jones. She passed away in July 2017, leaving behind a legacy of dedication to her mission of journalism that supports and protects people and the planet. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Statement from the American Chemistry Council:
    “Phthalates have been reviewed and studied by numerous government scientific agencies and regulatory bodies world-wide. Their conclusions have been essentially the same each time: that the phthalates in commerce today do not pose a risk to human health at real-life exposure levels. The authors acknowledge that a limitation of the study is that they cannot establish a link between any phthalate exposure and fast food consumption. No phthalates were actually measured or confirmed to be present in any foods. Data from the CDC over the last 10 years, the same data on which this study is based, demonstrate that exposure to phthalates from any source is very low."
  2. Elizabeth Grossman
    This study found "a consistent, positive association between fast food consumption and phthalates exposure." Its results are consistent w/previous studies measuring phthalates in comparable food.

    Published science showing phthalates’ adverse health effects is extensive. Concern about exposure to such hormone disrupting chemicals – including at low levels – has prompted the Endocrine Society, AMA, American Public Health Association & other scientific societies to call for exposure reduction.

    And on April 12, the FDA agreed to consider withdrawing its approval for 30 different phthalates, this in response to a legal petition submitted to the FDA by 10 NGOs, including NRDC, Environmental Defense Fund, Center for Food Safety and CSPI.
  3. It's inevitable to absorb the chemicals mentioned in the post as there are plenty of additives applied in the food to improve the storage time and flavor. Ways out of this situation should be setting safe line and eat less.
  4. Sally J Porlier
    Insane to me why the health insurance industry does little to stop toxic oils and packaging that cause so many horrible health issues. French fries must contribute to billions in DVT health care costs alone. Now I see the packaging it comes in is toxic too. Like frosting on the cake. Legal genocide IMO.

More from

Food Safety


hickens gather around a feeder at a farm on August 9, 2014 in Osage, Iowa. Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images

What Happened to Antibiotic-Free Chicken?

With the biggest poultry company in the country backtracking and other commitments to raising healthier birds unmet, the future is rockier than it once seemed.


Nik Sharma Offers His Top Tips for Home Cooks to Fight Recipe Fatigue

Nik Sharma baking at left, and tossing a chickpea dish at right. (Photo credit: Nik Sharma)

Far From Home, the Curry Leaf Tree Thrives

Zee Lilani of Kula Nursery stands among her curry leaf tree starts in Oakland, California. (Photo credit: Melati Citrawireja)

A Guide to Climate-Conscious Grocery Shopping

Changing How We Farm Might Protect Wild Mammals—and Fight Climate Change

A red fox in a Connecticut farm field. (Photo credit: Robert Winkler, Getty Images)