GMO Salmon is Coming to a Store Near You. Will You Know When it Arrives? | Civil Eats

GMO Salmon is Coming to a Store Near You. Will You Know When it Arrives?

If you’re choosing salmon, here’s what labels will—and won’t—tell you about the first edible genetically engineered animal approved for sale.


Update: On January 29, 2016, the FDA banned imports of GMO salmon until the agency can publish guidelines for how it should be labeled.  

Late last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved AquAdvantage salmon—the first edible genetically engineered animal to earn such an approval. The salmon, produced by AquaBounty Technologies, are genetically engineered (GE) with DNA that causes them to grow to market size much faster than other salmon. And while many advocates have shown concern over the fish in recent years, the FDA has declared it safe to eat.

The AquAdvantage salmon will only be raised in contained, inland facilities in Panama, from eggs produced in Canada. Once harvested, they will be imported for sale in the U.S. But exactly when they could show up on store shelves remains uncertain. “It is too early to discuss commercialization plans, but there are several paths to market that are being considered,” AquaBounty spokesperson Dave Conley told Civil Eats.

When the GE salmon does reach consumer audiences, will consumers be able to identify it? Probably not.

According to the “voluntary guidelines for GMO labeling” the FDA proposed when they approved the salmon last week, that decision will be left entirely up to the companies selling the fish. In their guidelines the FDA is suggesting—not requiring—that manufacturers “should consider” keeping records documenting whether or not their product is genetically engineered. The agency has also proposed that if companies do opt to label the salmon, the labels they use must meet existing FDA rules that manufacturers’ claims are “truthful and not misleading.”

But Food & Water Watch assistant director Patty Lovera says the odds that companies will disclose this information are incredibly low. In fact, she has yet to seen a food company do so. “The practical effect of voluntary labeling is no labeling,” she told Civil Eats.

A Guessing Game for Consumers

When it comes to fresh or frozen fish, eagle-eyed shoppers will, however, have a few clues with which to work. Because the AquAdvantage salmon will be raised in Panama, it will have to carry the country-of-origin (COOL) label required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These rules also require imported fish sold by retailers to be labeled as “farm-raised” or “wild caught.” So if shoppers see “farm-raised” and “Product of Panama” all on one package, the salmon could well be genetically engineered by AquaBounty.

Right now, Center for Food Safety policy analyst Jaydee Hanson says, “no other salmon is being raised commercially in Panama.” But there’s no guarantee that will remain the case.

Fish that has been processed—cooked or combined with other ingredients in a product like a frozen entrée with sauce or a salmon burger—has another set of labeling rules entirely. Salmon in these forms are exempt from COOL requirements. So are restaurants and what the USDA calls “food service establishments,” like cafeterias. The agency explains that while restaurant suppliers must make country-of-origin information and farmed or wild caught information “available” to their buyers, the restaurants themselves are not required to share this information with their customers.

Either way, if the FDA’s proposed voluntary labeling guidelines are approved, Just Label It executive director Scott Faber says, “consumers will have no way of knowing whether the salmon they are buying comes from nature or from a lab.”

AquaBounty maintains, however, that their GE salmon will be “traceable.”

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

The Lawsuits

The FDA has rejected petitions from Food &Water Watch asking that GE salmon be considered under food additive regulations rather than animal drug laws that it has used for this approval. The FDA has also rejected a Center for Food Safety (CFS) petition asking that labeling be mandatory for all food containing GE ingredients. CFS says it will bring a new lawsuit against the FDA for its approval of AquaBounty’s GE salmon. Other groups, including Food & Water Watch, are also considering legal action.

“We recognize that some consumers are interested in knowing whether food ingredients are derived from GE sources,” said Susan Mayne, director of the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, in a statement. But so far, FDA is leaving this up to manufacturers and setting strict rules for companies claiming to be GMO-free.

Is GE Salmon an “Animal Drug”?

On a technical note, AquaBounty’s salmon was approved through legal maneuvering under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that has allowed the GE salmon to be approved as an “animal drug.” And it turns out, this could further obscure what the public knows about GE fish—or other GE food animals that may eventually be approved.

“Lawyers at FDA figured out they could use the definition of a drug in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, [which says] a drug involves any substance that is intended to change the structure or function of an organism,” Dartmouth College professor of environmental studies and Union of Concerned Scientists board chair Anne Kapuscinski explained to Civil Eats. “They said, ‘we could stretch that to cover the transgene inserted into an animal whose intent is to change the function of the organism.’”

Why does this matter to general public? Because the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act “requires the FDA to keep the entire drug application process secret unless the applicant wants to make it public,” Kapuscinski explained. In the case of the AquaBounty GE salmon, the process was made public, but “that doesn’t mean others will be,” she said.

“The concern is about future applications. If they’re secret, how are we to know if the FDA is going to maintain adequate scientific rigor for assessing environmental risks,” Kapuscinski said.

There may indeed be other GE animals in the pipeline. For example, research is also apparently underway for a genetically engineered pig. In that case, scientists hope to reduce the animal’s odor and alter its taste.

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

Kapuscinski and colleagues have submitted extensive comments to the FDA pointing out environmental concerns, including potential gaps in information about how the GE salmon will be kept contained in Panama. According to the FDA, both Canadian and Panamanian facilities have numerous measures to prevent eggs or fish from escaping. In addition, the fish “produced for food in Panama will be an all-female, reproductively sterile population.”

In addition, Hanson points to inadequacies in the food safety review process. These include concerns about the small number of samples put through safety tests, including those for potential allergens.

Of course, retailers’ willingness is another important piece of the puzzle. Several including Costco, Safeway, and Kroger have said they have no plans to sell the AquAdvantage salmon. Other supermarket chains and retailers, including Target, Whole Foods, Trader Joe’s, and Aldi have made similar announcements. Last week, Walmart—a likely candidate—said it was too busy with “Black Friday” planning to comment.

Advocates are also concerned about the precedent this approval sets. Although the U.S. is the first nation to approve the salmon, Food and Water Watch’s Lovera says, “We’re very concerned about foreign markets. A lot of people take the FDA as a green-light.”

The FDA’s proposed voluntary guidelines on labeling for both GE salmon and other GE foods is open for public comment for 60 days beginning November 23rd.

Elizabeth Grossman was a senior reporter for Civil Eats from 2014 to 2017, where she focused on environmental and science issues. She is the author of Chasing Molecules, High Tech Trash, Watershed and other books. Her work appeared in a variety of publications, including National Geographic News, The Guardian, The Intercept, Scientific American, Environmental Health Perspectives, Yale e360, Ensia, High Country News, The Washington Post, Salon, The Nation, and Mother Jones. She passed away in July 2017, leaving behind a legacy of dedication to her mission of journalism that supports and protects people and the planet. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. It seems to me businesses are given entirely too much power when faced with whether or not to inform consumers about what they’re purchasing. If I want a diamond, I buy a diamond, not cubic zirconia; the choice should always be mine to make. Just because they fear consumers won’t purchase the product shouldn’t give them the right to conceal information we ask for. If we don’t buy it, DON’T STOCK IT. So many companies are looking for cheaper ways to increase their bottom line, and for what? Higher bonuses and outrageous pay? The domino effect is mind-blowing. I want to maintain my right to choose what I put in my body.
  2. Lara
    Great article. My understanding though is that the COOL (country of origin labeling) law has been repealed as of earlier this year? In May the WTO rejected a US appeal that it unfairly discriminates against imported meats from either Canada or Mexico. I'm not sure if this means that meats/seafoods imported from outside North America are still required. Have you found a solid answer on where COOL stands?
  3. Irene Brennan
    Americans want go healthy NOrmal food not this fake stuff full of man made poisons should be added too the food we eat .
    Stop the Dark Act and alikes please .
  4. Sean
    Where can we buy this then?

More from

Food Policy


Snow Geese fly over Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge. (Photo credit: Yiming Chen, Getty Images)

Bird Flu May Be Driven By This Overlooked Factor

In this week’s Field Report, we examine what happens when industrial animal operations encroach on wild waterfowl habitat, plus a new bill that supports wildlife on private lands, and gear that could protect farmworkers from avian flu.


Changing How We Farm Might Protect Wild Mammals—and Fight Climate Change

A red fox in a Connecticut farm field. (Photo credit: Robert Winkler, Getty Images)

Across Farm Country, Fertilizer Pollution Impacts Not Just Health, but Water Costs, Too

An Illinois farmer fertilizes a field before planting. (Photo credit: Scott Olson, Getty Images)

New School Meal Standards Could Put More Local Food on Students’ Lunch Trays

A student at Ashford Elementary School in Houston fills up on local food in his school lunch. (USDA Photo by Lance Cheung)

Strawberry Farmworkers Fight for a Living Wage

A Mixtec immigrant from Oaxaca picks strawberries in Oxnard, Calif. She and her sister support three other family members, all of whom sleep and live in a single room in a house. (Photo © David Bacon)