Could This Bill Make Local Meat More Affordable? | Civil Eats

Could This Bill Make Local Meat More Affordable?

The federal PRIME Act might make it easier for small-scale farmers to process meat to sell direct to consumers.

selling meat at a farmers market

Farmers and ranchers raising livestock for sale face three possible paths. They can ship their animals to a feedlot, where a large company grain-finishes, processes, and cuts the meat, the most common route of sale. They can raise it to market weight themselves and sell it as a live animal to a potential buyer (or group of buyers, as in the case of a co-op), who will then be responsible for processing and packaging the meat for their own use. Or they can send the animal to a U.S. Department of Agriculture-inspected facility for processing, the only option which enables a producer to sell individual packages of meat to the public.

Ever since 1967, when Congress passed the Wholesome Meat Act, producers have been required to use a USDA-inspected facility for processing if they wish to sell meat directly to consumers, restaurants, and grocery stores.

These facilities are few and far between, with some states only offering one USDA-inspected plant, and roughly half of the states in the nation completely lacking such a facility. And those numbers are still in decline. In a time of growing awareness about the ills of factory farming and increasing demand for local, pasture-raised meat, many small producers who might sell direct to consumers just don’t have time to drive for hours to get it processed.

“When I take my animals to be processed, I drive past a custom facility three miles from my house and travel three hours to the USDA facility,” Congressman and beef producer Thomas Massie (Republican-Kentucky) told Civil Eats.

In July, representatives Massie and another farmer, Maine Democrat Chellie Pingree introduced a bill called the PRIME (Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption) Act to address precisely this problem. (The two have also worked together on a pair of bills they say would make it easier for farmers to sell raw milk.) Just how far the Act will get in today’s Congress is difficult to guess, but many hope the legislation will allow farmers and ranchers to better serve their local customers.

When the Wholesome Meat Act passed 50 years ago, the nation saw a radical consolidation of meat processing, resulting in higher prices and much fewer options for consumers looking to purchase locally raised meat. Today, just four companies produce 80 percent of the beef sold in the U.S. Another four companies produce 60 percent of the pork, and five produce 60 percent of the poultry.

“Meat production used to be one of the most competitive industries in the nation, but in the last 50 years, the slaughterhouse infrastructure has crumbled,” says Pete Kennedy, President of the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund. After the Wholesome Meat Act, he adds, “The USDA started raising the bar of requirements for small-scale processing facilities, demanding unnecessary upgrades for these facilities to stay in business. Many couldn’t afford the upgrades, so thousands of plants were forced to close their doors.”

The PRIME Act would effectively place regulatory responsibility back in the hands of individual states. This would give states the freedom to allow small farms to sell their custom-processed products directly to consumers, grocery stores, and restaurants within state lines, avoiding federal inspection. In addition to making it easier for local producers to sell their meat, Pingree and Massie also believe the bill would revive the small-scale meat processing industry in the United States.

“If the PRIME Act passes, it will take the market share back from the four big companies which package the majority of the meat we eat,” ” says Kennedy.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Jeff Alderman, the owner and operator of a small custom-processing facility in Montana, believes the legislation could have a profound impact. “It’s almost impossible to sell your own meat right now,” he says. “If we want to process and sell homegrown beef, we have to schedule a federal inspector to come up and watch that animal be killed, butchered, and packaged, even though we are a state-licensed, health department-inspected, facility. The regulations and costs make it impossible for us to meet the public demand.”

Furthermore, Alderman, whose facility generally processes wild game for hunters, makes the case that small processors are well equipped to provide a safe product.

“We run a much tighter ship than most of the large packing plants,” He explains. For one, his plant only processes one animal at a time, and the plant is cleaned thoroughly between animals, which makes it safer from a food safety perspective. “Some of the big USDA facilities slaughter 14,000 animals per day. It’s not possible to thoroughly inspect that many animals,” he adds.

In a recent blog post for the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, Polyface Farm’s Joel Salatin, who also wrote the Preamble for a PRIME Act Alert, argued that if more small meat processing plants were freed up to serve a wider audience, it could, “greatly cheapen the cost of local food systems without compromising food safety at all.”

Kristina Butts, Legislative Expert for the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, disagrees. She says the bill would “allow slaughter plants to sell to consumers without adhering to standard food safety regulations, which we think is a bad idea.”

“If this bill gains momentum, we will oppose it,” she says.

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

But Alderman believes that the current system might not be any safer. “A lot of these ranchers are so sick and tired of these ridiculous regulations, they’re just starting to butcher their own beef at home and sell it,” he says. “But then, you really don’t know what you’re getting. If this bill passes, it will open the door for the little guy, and keep the food supply safe.”


Lauren Dixon is an organic farmer, writer, blogger, and teacher, carving out a living from a mountainside homestead in Montana. When she’s not making bread or milking goats, she’s sipping coffee at her kitchen table, writing about farming, food policy, and the practical arts of the radical homemaker’s lifestyle. She hopes to see the day when every home has a vegetable garden, and every child knows where his food comes from. Her blog can be found at Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Rockfish
    I really hope this bill makes progress. I have been trying to join a local beef CSA but the ranch has had to stop the program due to problems finding and keeping a processing plant.
    But I'm confused about one thing. Who do these "custom facilities" serve? From the 3 options laid out in the opening paragraph it would seem only they would only be processing animals sold live to co-ops. That can't be a very big market.
    • Twilight Greenaway
      Great question. May of them also serve hunters whose meat is not for sale.
  2. doug
    Problem is food safety. One salmonella outbreak and poof, they close down. Believe it.
  3. The argument that Katherine Butts and many others make is that without being processed by USDA facilities, local meat would be unsafe for human consumption. This is a flawed argument because many local custom facilities are inspected more closely than USDA facilities because as the article said, they don't process meat in mass so they're able to take extra precautions like cleaning the machines after every piece of meat.
    Also, I'm sure smaller local facilities don't create the same health issues that large national USDA facilities have. A USDA facility processes meat from all around the country, meaning if one animal has an infectious bacteria, e.g. E. Coli, all animals will be infected with it.
    Hopefully this bill will pass!
  4. Blair
    As a small Fresh sausage, smoked sausage and bacon producer we are all for PRIME
    It is obvious Kristina Butts comment the small guys are to be in business.
  5. Ben
    I'm skeptical on how much this will help. I live 15 min from a USDA inspected custom facility. The real problem seems to be labor costs and efficiencies of a small plant vs a large plant which I have toured. My processing cost can easily be $500 per animal! The largest beef finishing operation in Maine trucks their animals from the very Northern tip of Maine all the way to PA, why? The processing cost at large facility is far cheaper because of the efficiency, the product also enters the distribution chain there. Large plants also have a market for absolutely everything, including a rendering plant next door. Small producers can't utilize these facilities, they don't have enough animals as an individual.
  6. Mark E. Brown
    What are the current regulations, concerning cured meats? Specifically, if USDA inspected, cased meats are cured and dried. I am an artisanal salumi maker, and people, after tasting my cures and ratios, often want to buy some for their own consumption. I do not sell to them, but barter for other goods and/or services.

More from

Food Policy



Zero-Waste Grocery Stores in Growth Mode as Consumers Seek to Ditch Plastic

Inside a re_ grocery store in the Mar Vista neighborhood of Los Angeles. (Photo courtesy of re_grocery)

Oral History Project Preserves Black and Indigenous Food Traditions

Ira Wallace (left) and Sariyah Benoit sit together in Spelman College’s Victory Garden. (Photo credit: Heirloom Gardens Project)

Can AI Help Cut Plastic Waste From the Food System?

Pesticide Industry Could Win Big in Latest Farm Bill Proposal