Here's What a 'Healthy Meal' in Your Kid's Daycare Could Look Like | Civil Eats

Here’s What a ‘Healthy Meal’ in Your Kid’s Daycare Could Look Like

USDA's New Proposed Daycare Meal Standards Offer Small Improvements, But Still Fall Short

CACFP Breakfast NO TEXTLast September I described how surprisingly unhealthy foods–Rice Krispies treats, donuts, and Pop Tarts–can be fed to children in federally funded daycare meal programs.

Now, federal daycare meals are about to get their first nutritional overhaul since 1968. Under the same 2010 legislation mandating healthier school meals, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) was charged with coming up with improved standards for the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), the program that oversees daycare food as well as meals served in after-school snack programs, adult group homes, and similar facilities.

The USDA released its proposed new CACFP rules in January and the results are decidedly mixed.

On the one hand, the new rules do bring improvements. CACFP providers will now be required to serve children a greater variety of fruits and vegetables, more whole grains, and less sugar and fat–at least as compared to the old meal standards. The rules also include greater support for breastfeeding mothers, the acceptance of tofu as a meat substitute, and requirements that water be made available at meals, that “grain-based desserts” like cookies no longer fulfill children’s daily grain requirement, and that breakfast cereals contain less sugar.

That’s all good news. But there are still some glaring nutritional deficiencies in the proposed rules. Here are some examples:

  • CACFP providers may not fry foods on their own premises, but may still serve foods fried off-site, whether by manufacturers of products like frozen French fries or deep-fried fish sticks, or by a third-party caterer. And there’s no limit on the number of times fried foods may be served each week.
  • For children over one year of age, all fruit or vegetable requirements may be fulfilled by serving 100 percent fruit or vegetable juice, and while two juices may not be served at the same meal, there’s otherwise no limit on the number of times juice may be served each day For children over one year of age, snacks must contain two meal components, but neither has to be a fruit or vegetable. And there’s no affirmative requirement that any of the vegetables served include dark green or red/orange vegetables.
  • Children over one year of age may be served flavored milk at every meal, without any limits on sugar content, so long as the flavored milk is fat-free.
  • Children need only be served one whole grain or “whole-grain rich” (at least 50 percent whole grain) food a day, and the rest of a child’s grain allotment may consist of enriched white flour products. And while USDA has yet to provide guidance on what foods constitute “grain-based desserts,” it seems likely (based on acceptable breakfast foods offered in the federal School Breakfast Program) that items such as Pop Tarts and sweet rolls, particularly if whole-grain rich, will still be permissible. There’s no limit on the number of times processed or fattier meats may be served each week.

Many of these surprisingly low nutritional standards run counter to recommendations from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which provided the USDA with science-based advice for overhauling the CACFP, just as it did for school meals. But the USDA admits that in some cases it chose to ignore IOM nutritional recommendations due to likely “increased cost or complexity” in implementing them.

Instead, the USDA offers CACFP providers a list of recommended “best practices” such as offering children more whole grains, not serving any flavored milk, and limiting juice to once a day and fried foods to once a week.  But it also makes clear that such practices are to be implemented “at the sole discretion of the provider.”  So if a daycare provider chose to disregard all of USDA’s “best practices,” here’s what acceptable meals for a child aged 3-5 could still look like under the new proposed meal standards:

CACFP Breakfast Revised

newsmatch 2023 banner - donate to support civil eats

CACFP Lunch RevisedCACFP Snack Revised

The USDA clearly anticipates public discussion of some of these issues and has floated various alternatives to the final rules, such as prohibiting flavored milk altogether for all children aged 2-4 or limiting the sugar in flavored milk to 22 grams per 8 fluid ounces. It has proposed similar alternatives regarding the sugar content in yogurt and has also sought the public’s opinion on how to define “frying” and “processed meats.”

Ultimately, though, better nutrition costs money. According to the rules’ preamble, the IOM acknowledged that if CACFP providers were to implement all of its dietary recommendations, it “would increase the cost of meals by an average of 27 percent to 44 percent for all age groups, except infants,” and the USDA ultimately decided that “any proposed changes to the meal pattern must be implemented by providers without undue difficulty and be sensitive to cost.”

What’s notable, though, is that 2015 will bring the reauthorization of the Child Nutrition ACT (or CNR), the Congressional funding bill that funds all federal child nutrition programs once every five years. This timing presents a prime opportunity to seek higher CACFP reimbursement rates–which could make more nutritious food affordable for daycare providers. It’s a request that seems justifiable given that the program is getting its first nutritional makeover since the Johnson administration.

But President Obama’s newly released fiscal 2016 budget contains no proposal from the White House to increase CACFP funding, nor are there any such requests at the present time from any members of Congress. When asked in an email if the USDA itself would push for more funding in 2015 to cover its proposed “best practices,” an agency spokesperson would only note that the prior (2010) CNR “did not provide any funding for additional meal reimbursement for the CACFP. USDA developed the CACFP proposed rule with that in mind.”

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

The 90-day public comment period for the proposed CACFP rules closes on April 15, 2015.  Comments may be submitted here.

Bettina Elias Siegel is a nationally recognized writer and commentator on issues relating to children and food. Her work has appeared in The New York Times, The Guardian, The Houston Chronicle, and other publications. She's the author of Kid Food: The Challenge of Feeding Children in a Highly Processed World and for 12 years covered the world of kid food and school nutrition in The Lunch Tray. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. The pictures tell the story:
    "glaring nutritional deficiencies in the proposed rules"
  2. Casey - After I read the regs, I started creating sample meals in my head to see just how bad it could get. That's what gave me the idea for the photo montages, which I agree really tell you everything you need to know about the laxity of these "improved" standards.

    I hope readers will take the time to tell USDA what they think, and thanks for your comment here.
  3. Amanda
    Some of the biggest challenges here are funding, as you mentioned, but also that child care providers, unlike school food service directors, may only have a high school education and little to no nutrition background. The other part of this balancing act is that child care providers could opt out of CACFP altogether if the rules get too complicated. This is a real concern because CACFP participation by child care homes has been steadily decreasing since 1996.

    It's easy to criticize the proposed regulations, but what's more challenging is to propose better alternatives that provide better nutrition for infants and children while being feasible enough for providers to understand and implement within the existing budget constraints.

More from

Commentary

Featured

Strawberries sit in rows covered in agricultural plastic.

Can Agriculture Kick Its Plastic Addiction?

While the plastics used at every step of the farming process can boost productivity, they also pollute the soil and the food we eat. New research has farmers and advocates pushing for change.

Popular

With Season 2, ‘High on the Hog’ Deepens the Story of the Nation’s Black Food Traditions

Stephen Satterfield and Jessica B. Harris watching the sunset at the beach, in a still from Netflix's High on the Hog Season 2. (Photo courtesy of Netflix)

Building a Case for Investment in Regenerative Agriculture on Indigenous Farms

Jess Brewer gathers livestock at Brewer Ranch on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation. (Photo courtesy of Intertribal Agriculture Council, www.indianag.org)

Walmart and EDF Forged an Unlikely Partnership. 17 Years Later, What’s Changed?

Aerial view of cargo containers, semi trailers, industrial warehouse, storage building and loading docks, renewable energy plants, Bavaria, Germany

Relocalizing the Food System to Fight a ‘Farm-Free Future’