USDA Pilots New Farm-To-School Programs | Civil Eats

USDA Pilots New Farm-To-School Programs

At first glance, the 2014 Farm Bill may look like business as usual. But there is also some good news for local food advocates buried deep in the $956 billion bill, and a new pilot program that promises to place more local produce in schools is worth applauding.

Starting next school year, these programs would provide local fruit and vegetables for at least five, and up to eight, pilot schools across the country, with at least one state in each of the five main regions of the country (the Northeast, the Pacific Northwest, the South, the West, and the Midwest). (The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is expected to release a Request for Proposals (RFP) in the coming months.)

Although the pilot programs do not have any mandatory funding attached to them, USDA expects to be able to move forward with the implementation of the programs without any additional funding.

The new program carries forward another pilot that took place in 2011, in Michigan and Florida schools, where USDA purchased local lettuce, apples, grapes, oranges, carrots, and blueberries, and funneled them to schools through the state.

Although non-governmental (non-profit and school-based) farm-to-school programs have existed in several states throughout the country for many years, and a large number of states have passed farm-to-school legislation, the USDA program is essentially the first federally backed investment supporting the inclusion of local fruits and vegetables for school breakfast, lunch, and snack programs.

In terms of federal legislation, farm-to-school has been part of the Child Nutrition Act since 2004, and in 2010, USDA received funding to administer the Farm to School Grant Program. Now the Farm Bill also includes explicit language in support of farm-to-school. Ideally, say advocates, this will makes it easier for schools to be flexible in what they can serve their students, and support accompanying food and nutrition education.

Along with school gardens and food systems education, the National Farm to School Network’s (NFSN) Policy and Strategic Partnerships Director Helen Dombalis says “local procurement is the third key piece of farm-to-school.” NFSN advocated for the pilots along with National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (NSAC) and Dombalis sees them as an important start.

Eugene Kim, a Policy Specialist at NSAC, described the pilots as “a great opportunity to encourage diversity and innovation in farm-to-school,” and a “chance for schools and states to learn from successes and failures.”

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

By reconnecting young people to their food and giving them access to more fresh fruits and vegetables, farm-to-school programming is known to generate an increased interest in and willingness to try healthy foods.

There is also ample science showing that foods that are consumed closer to their source generally contain a higher nutrient value. And small, localized farms to tend to favor taste, nutrition, and diversity over maximum yield and “shipability” when choosing varieties.

Sourcing fresh, local food for school lunches carries with it the added benefit of contributing to the local economy and supporting local farmers. In one economic analysis, Cooperative Extension in Minnesota found that farmers were positively impacted by selling their produce to schools, regardless of how much the schools were willing to pay for the products, simply because the school system presented a new market.

A Modest Program With Great Potential

In their recommendations to USDA, NFSN, and NSAC make a purposeful attempt to engage beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers (defined as those whose identity in a group has subjected them to racial or ethnic prejudice without regard to their individual identity) in the farm-to-school movement.

USDA also has the opportunity to provide training and technical assistance for school food representatives and farmers.  As with anything in the world of food, both the supply and demand end of the equation must be addressed. USDA has the opportunity to craft resources that both encourage farmers to participate in farm-to-school programs and to provide schools with the tools necessary to purchase, process, and serve food that comes directly from farms (versus pre-prepared foods that merely need to be reheated).

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

These new pilots might also open the door for USDA to consider a nuanced food safety regimen when it comes to school food that is scale-appropriate and practical for schools and for farmers. In most cases, farms that sell to schools must be certified through Good Agriculture Practices (GAP), or similar state run food safety regimen. This often poses a barrier to getting fresher, local foods into schools

In the meantime, advocates can celebrate a small win with big potential. Dombalis says,  “We are excited that … USDA will be exploring alternative procurement models for local produce. The lessons learned will inform the future expansion of farm-to-school, ultimately resulting in more wins for kids, farmers, and communities.”

Allison is a former FoodCorps service member and a current intern for the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. She led garden and nutrition education classes with elementary school students, worked on farms in Massachusetts, Vermont and North Carolina, and is the co-founder of a non-profit organization in Vermont that supports farm, food and local economy initiatives. She has a Master's degree in Environmental Law and Policy from Vermont Law School. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Crystal
    Does this mean schools in the Northeastern states can no longer serve citrus or other nonlocal foods? I worry USDA is divorced from the reality of our localities and our schools. Locavore eating is easy if you live in central California. I find it is quite a struggle here in Minnesota and I imagine it has seasonal limitations in most of the Northern U.S. as well. Fresh foods are great but they become boring pretty fast when there is no variety. School children are finicky eaters as it is. It is such a dangerous idea to strip variety from their diets by insisting on locally sourced foods.
  2. Alex
    In this new funding, there are no mandates for schools to source exclusively from local farms. It offers funding to programs (starting and expanding) and lowers certain barriers districts and schools already face in trying to bring in more locally sourced ingredients. Schools will continue to be able to serve orange slices - don't worry.

    Also, northern climates bring challenges to sourcing locally, but there are lots of creative solutions that are being piloted: exciting ways to prepare roots, greens and squashes (they are delicious! Why should students only get boring, bland versions?!); central kitchens processing and freezing summer produce for winter; and capitalizing on less-utilized foods like local lentils and beef in Montana.
  3. joanne
    I'm in the Burlington, Vermont School District (Farm to School groundbreakers) and my daughter (who was a picky eater before kindergarten) eats a wide and varied array of foods now. All of the foods are made by the school district and I can't say enough good things about the program. If the rest of the country follows suit, children will be healthy and nourished.

More from

School Food



Zero-Waste Grocery Stores in Growth Mode as Consumers Seek to Ditch Plastic

Inside a re_ grocery store in the Mar Vista neighborhood of Los Angeles. (Photo courtesy of re_grocery)

On Farms, ‘Plasticulture’ Persists

Rows of plastic-covered strawberry plants.

Can AI Help Cut Plastic Waste From the Food System?

Pesticide Industry Could Win Big in Latest Farm Bill Proposal