Damning New Study Demonstrates Harm to Animals Raised on GMO Feed | Civil Eats

Damning New Study Demonstrates Harm to Animals Raised on GMO Feed

Just when you thought the market for controversy over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) was completely saturated, a new study published in the Journal of Organic Systems finds that pigs raised on a mixed diet of GM corn and GM soy had higher rates of intestinal problems, “including inflammation of the stomach and small intestine, stomach ulcers, a thinning of intestinal walls and an increase in haemorrhagic bowel disease, where a pig can rapidly ‘bleed-out’ from their bowel and die.” Both male and female pigs reared on the GM diet were more likely to have severe stomach inflammation, at a rate of four times and 2.2 times the control group, respectively. There were also reproductive effects: the uteri of female pigs raised on GM feed were 25 percent larger (in proportion to body size) than those of control sows. (All male pigs were neutered, so scientists were unable to study any effects on the male reproductive systems.)

The study confirms anecdotal evidence from hog farmers who’ve reported reproductive and digestive problems in pigs raised on GM feed. Those who were following this sort of news in 2011 will remember an open letter to the USDA from Dr. M. Huber, a professor at Purdue University, about an unknown organism in Roundup Ready crops causing miscarriages in farm animals.

A common complaint from critics of GM technology – often painted as “anti-science” by GM proponents – is that they’ve been inadequately studied. (Don’t think about that for too long – your first instinct is correct, it doesn’t make sense.) The European Union has long based its regulatory framework (and resultant slow adoption of GMOs) on the precautionary principle. And in fact, according to this study, most of the research on the health impacts of GMOs has either been short term (less than 90 days), performed on non-mammals or failed to examine multiple GM traits concurrently, despite that many new GM crops “stack” traits, and that many diets – of both animals and humans – include multiple types of GMOs.

The scientists behind the study report having chosen pigs as their subject for the similarity between their digestive systems and those of humans, and the mixed GM diet for its similarity to the real-life diets of both swine and humans, so this is really damning stuff. They also describe their findings as conservative, noting that even the control group is likely to have been exposed to GMOs in indirect ways they couldn’t avoid, such as trace amounts of GMOs in non-GM feed, and parents fed GM diets.

As one might expect, the scientists conclude their report with a call for more testing, particularly of whether the findings also apply to humans. Scientists at the Consumers Union go one further, saying that concerns raised by the study further underscore the need to label GMOs.

Will the government listen? Time will tell. It’s also  hard to predict the potential impact of this study on the US pork market – or on the prices of corn and soy. As we saw recently when Japan and South Korea canceled orders for US-produced wheat after the discovery of unapproved GM wheat in Oregon, not all countries take a laissez-faire approach to GMOs. And what about that merger/takeover of Smithfield Foods by Chinese-held Shuanghui, rumored to have been spurred in part by friction over the livestock drug ractopamine? For that matter, will American hog farmers – seeking rightly to avoid sickening their own hogs – seek non-GM feed from other countries?

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

For now, more questions than answers, but if the findings of this study are as serious as they look, American agriculture may be on the verge of paying a very dear price for a long roll in the hay with the biotech industry.

Originally published on EcoCenteric

Thank you for being a loyal reader.

We rely on you. Become a member today to read unlimited stories.

Leslie Hatfield is senior editor at the GRACE Communications Foundation, where she edits and manages Ecocentric, a blog about food, water and energy issues. Leslie has contributed to The Huffington Post, Alternet, The Ethicurean, Grist, Civil Eats and Edible Chesapeake, and served as lead author of the publication Cultivating the Web: High Tech Tools for the Sustainable Food Movement. Leslie has participated in panels on food issues and digital media at conferences including the Brooklyn Food Conference (Brooklyn, 2009), the Community Food Security Coalition's annual gathering (Des Moines, 2009), the James Beard Foundation's Annual Conference (New York, 2011), Edible Institute (Santa Barbara, 2012) and Net Impact (Baltimore, 2012). In spring 2011, she taught a masters level elective course called Food Policy: Digital Cultivation as a visiting faculty member at The Evergreen State College. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

    More from

    GMOs

    Featured

    (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    Medically Important Antibiotics Are Still Being Used to Fatten Up Pigs

    In this week’s Field Report, USDA data reveals that some farmers give pigs antibiotics for “growth promotion,” a practice banned since 2017. Plus: PFAS in pesticides, new rules for contract farmers, and just-published research showing a healthy diet is also better for the planet.

    Popular

    Zero-Waste Grocery Stores in Growth Mode as Consumers Seek to Ditch Plastic

    Inside a re_ grocery store in the Mar Vista neighborhood of Los Angeles. (Photo courtesy of re_grocery)

    Pesticide Industry Could Win Big in Latest Farm Bill Proposal

    Restaurants Create a Mound of Plastic Waste. Some Are Working to Fix That.

    What Happened to Antibiotic-Free Chicken?

    hickens gather around a feeder at a farm on August 9, 2014 in Osage, Iowa. Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images