The Corporate Hijacking of America’s Land-Grant Universities | Civil Eats

The Corporate Hijacking of America’s Land-Grant Universities

If you live in the United States, you’re never far from a land-grant university.  There are more than 100 of these institutions, which go by names like Texas A&M, Iowa State University and the University of California.

This system of schools was initiated in 1862 with lofty goals in mind—elevating agriculture to the realm of science, offering the common citizen access to higher education, and pursuing research that helps farmers improve their fields and fatten their hens. The program was a major success, providing invaluable research that was freely shared with farmers, which revolutionized American agriculture.

Unfortunately, today these public institutions are increasingly serving private interests, not the public good. Hundreds of millions of dollars are now flowing from corporate agribusiness into the land-grant university to sponsor buildings, endow professorships and pay for research. One land-grant university, South Dakota State, is headed by a man who sits on Monsanto’s board of directors.  

The influence this money purchases is enormous. Corporate money shifts the public research agenda toward the ambitions of the private sector, whose profit motivations are often at odds with the public good. It strips our public research institutions of the time, resources and independence needed to pursue public-interest research that challenges the status quo of corporate control over our food system or that offers farmers alternative agricultural systems to monocultures and factory farms.

Industry-funded research routinely produces results that are—surprise, surprise—favorable to industry. This “funder effect” produces a well-documented bias on research while weak conflict-of-interest policies throughout academia (including at many scientific journals, which don’t require full disclosure of funding source) mean agribusiness’s pervasive influence over public research is basically unchecked.

It also means that our nation’s regulators and policy makers—always clamoring for science-based rules and regulations—are making decisions about things like the safety of genetically engineered crops based on a body of research and science that is incomplete and, to some degree, biased.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

So how do we weed out the agribusiness influence?  A good place to start would be increasing federal support for agriculture research—and directing this money to projects that serve the public interest.  This would go a long ways toward reducing land-grant university’s dependence on corporate funding and allow researchers more independence.

For more information about corporate influence on land-grant universities and recommendations for restoring more independent, objective academic research, read Food & Water Watch’s report Public Research, Private Gain: Corporate Influence Over University Agricultural Research

Graph note: Other government money–from states and non-USDA federal sources like the National Institutes of Health–comprises the remaining research funding. (See Endnote 29).

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

Tim Schwab is a food researcher at Food and Water Watch. He has a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana (a land-grant school) and worked as a reporter and researcher on a variety of projects before joining Food and Water Watch. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Roscoe
    There would be little scientific progress at all if corporate funders weren't sponsoring meaningful land grant research programs. Left to their own devises overpaid tenured college professors go to seed practicing opinionated pop science and dreaming of lavish funding to reinvent the wooden wheel.
  2. cato
    This is not new. This has been going on for a long time, at least at Iowa State.

More from

Agroecology

Featured

A contract chicken farmer raises chickens under the tournament system

Op-ed: It’s Time to End the Poultry Industry’s Exploitative Contracts

Most chicken growers must compete in a tournament system that pays the top producers using money that would have gone to pay the lowest producers. The DOJ is putting a stop to the practice for some farmers—and now the USDA has a chance to follow suit.

Popular

The Field Report: What the Historic Climate Bill Means for Farmers and the Food System

Flooded fields in winter

Are Criollo Cattle a Regenerative Solution to a 1,200-Year Megadrought?

criollo cattle grazing

22 Solutions-Focused Stories on the Food System in 2022

Abby Barrows pulling up one of her experimental oyster bags made of metal and wood at Long Cove Sea Farm. (Photo credit: Greta Rybus)

Op-ed: Farmworkers Face Stress and Depression. The Pandemic Made It Worse.

Migrant farm laborers have their temperature checked in King City, California. (Photo credit: Brent Stirton, Getty Images)