California Ignores Its Own Scientists on Dangerous Pesticide | Civil Eats

California Ignores Its Own Scientists on Dangerous Pesticide

Applying* a cancer-causing poison on California’s farm fields sounds like some dastardly plot hatched by a Batman super-villain. Unfortunately, reality is often scarier than fiction. In December 2010, the State of California approved the known carcinogen methyl iodide for use on the state’s farm fields. Yes, you read that right—a chemical that actually causes cancer was approved to be applied* on the fields that grow the Golden State’s most prized crops.

Earthjustice promptly filed a lawsuit in January challenging the state’s approval of the toxic pesticide. As a result of the lawsuit, Earthjustice recently obtained internal documents detailing dire warnings about methyl iodide from scientists at the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Unfortunately, those dire warnings fell on deaf ears and then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger approved methyl iodide for use.

“These smoking gun memos show that state officials cherry-picked calculations to support their preferred outcome of approving methyl iodide instead of letting science guide their decision-making,” said Susan Kegley, PhD, Consulting Scientist with Pesticide Action Network North America. “Ignoring the science and prioritizing the needs of the manufacturer has put the health and safety of Californians at great risk.”

Methyl iodide, produced by the agri-chemical concern Arysta LifeSciences, is a highly toxic pesticide that kills weeds, insects, nematodes, soil borne pathogens, and basically anything else that lives below ground. The chemical is most threatening to the men and women who work in California’s strawberry fields where the majority of the pesticide will be applied. Those farm workers risk eye irritation, nausea, central nervous system disorders, late-term miscarriages, and the aforementioned cancer.

“I’m mad that the Department of Pesticide Regulation, which is supposed to protect us from pesticides, was hijacked by a pesticide company,” said plaintiff Jose Hidalgo. “As a strawberry picker, we frequently see pesticide tarps blowing in the wind and experience the pain of pesticide exposure.”

State experts weren’t alone in warning about the dangers of widespread use of the cancer causing poison. Fifty eminent scientists, including six Nobel Laureates in Chemistry, said methyl iodide is one of the more toxic chemicals used in manufacturing. California’s own Scientific Review Committee agreed. Dr. John Froines, chair of the Committee, told the press: “I honestly think that this chemical will cause disease and illness. And so does everyone else on the committee.”

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Earthjustice’s lawsuit claims that the state’s approval of methyl iodide violated the California Environmental Quality Act, the California Birth Defects Prevention Act, and the Pesticide Contamination Prevention Act. The suit also contends that the state failed to involve the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment in the development of farmworker safety regulations. Failing a settlement, the case could be heard as early as January 2012.

*Editor’s correction

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

David Lawlor is the Development Writer for Earthjustice, the largest nonprofit environmental law firm in the world. Lawlor graduated with a B.A. in Journalism from San Francisco State University and earned his M.A. in Social Science with an emphasis in environmental issues from Humboldt State University in Arcata, California. He has worked as a writer and editor for various newspapers, magazines, and Web sites. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Lea Brooks
    Correction requested. You are entitled to your opinion, but it should be based on fact. Shame on you for deliberately continuing to spread misinformation that methyl iodide is sprayed on strawberries. Not true.

    Methyl iodide is not sprayed. It is a fumigant that is injected into the soil BEFORE crops are planted to kill soil-borne pests.

    Lea Brooks
    Department of Pesticide Regulation
  2. This almost makes me sick to the stomach. God knows what the long term effects will be to these poor workers, the authority's need to rectify this issue immediately
  3. Erika
    I CANNOT believe this! How can this still be happening today? Disgusting to me that it is more important to get more/perfect looking strawberries than having safe strawberries to feed our families, keep our farm workers safer and to protect the dirt we grow our food in...our earth. What was the thinking here?

    I am so glad I only buy organic strawberries now from the farmers market. Sad I can't trust our government to protect me. Sad to think of all the families that don't know this stuff & keep buying those large, pretty berries from the store.

    I just don't get it.
  4. n
    "When asked whether there are better chemical alternatives to methyl bromide, those concerned about methyl iodide say they are philosophically opposed to using any fumigant in soil. "When we have created an agricultural system that is dependent on highly hazardous chemicals, it seems to me that one way to address the question of alternatives is to ask whether or not we should be redesigning our agricultural system," Schettler says. "That is an important debate that is going on in many places. But it is not one that we'll find the pesticide program of EPA engaging in at all because they somehow have bound themselves off from that conversation and talk simply about alternative chemicals."

    http://pubs.acs.org/cen/government/86/8643gov2.html
  5. Debbie
    I bought strawberries at Walmart last week and after looking at them, my husband and I noticed they had a strange neon red color and smelled like bleach. We threw them in the garbage and will not be shopping at Walmart for any groceries ever again.
  6. n
    Do appreciate the comments at the end of this article:

    http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/news/2011/mar/10/midas-touch-midas-effect/
  7. n
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/30/california-pesticides-officials-ignored-scientists_n_942757.html

More from

Nutrition

Featured

A watercolor-style illustration of a marine observer looking through binoculars at a tuna fishing vessel. (Illustration credit: Tina Zellmer)

The True Cost of Tuna: Marine Observers Dying at Sea

The harassment, abuse, and sometimes death of the marine observers who uphold sustainable seafood standards are the industry’s worst-kept secrets. Critics say the people and companies that earn the most money on tuna aren’t doing enough to secure their well-being.

Popular

Food Prices Are Still High. What Role Do Corporate Profits Play?

a young family carries the shopping in together despite high food prices

This Community Garden Helps Farmworkers Feed Themselves. Now It’s Facing Eviction.

A farmworkers grows stands in the fields harvesting food at the Tierras Milperas community garden.

Can Farming With Trees Save the Food System?

Op-ed: How Federal Dollars Can Help Ease the Rural Water Crisis

A resident of Porterville, California, carries a case of bottled water for use at home. (Photo credit: Justin Sullivan, Getty Images)