Urban Farms Aren't Just for Yuppies | Civil Eats

Urban Farms Aren’t Just for Yuppies

Tom Philpott makes a crucial point in his must-read post on the potential and perils of urban ag. You can’t criticize urban farms for their reliance on grants and donations without acknowledging that virtually all forms of agriculture require heavy subsidies in some form or another:

…[A]ll farms struggle mightily to “thrive in a market economy” — and relatively few actually do. The most obvious evidence to back up this point is commodity subsidies. If any farm type should be able to thrive in the free market, it would be the large corn and soy farms of the Midwest. They stand on one of the world’s greatest stores of topsoil; they are highly capitalized, with towering combines tricked out with GPS and other technology that allow a single farmer to cover thousands of acres. They have have access to high-tech seeds and bottomless amounts of fertilizer and pesticides. Agribusiness giants like ADM and Cargill have built up an elaborate infrastructure to buy their goods and ship them around the globe.

Yet over most of the past 20 years, corn and soy prices have hovered under the cost of production, making these farms reliant on billions of dollars in annual subsidies to stay solvent. They’ve turned marginally profitable over the past few years — not due to the magic of the free market, however, but because a government-mandated and -subsidized ethanol program has lifted corn and soy prices. Like urban farms, “economic sustainability eludes them.” They are wards not of the foundations, but rather of the state.

Philpott then observes that, according to USDA data, most farms run as businesses (rather than hobbies) contribute only a small fraction of farmers total income. What the government doesn’t subsidize, “off-farm income of farmers and their spouses” does:

For farms that bring in between $10,000 and $249,000 in gross sales, farm income represents a tiny fraction of farm families’ overall earnings (see green sliver in middle bar). This category encompasses the non-hobby, small- and mid-sized farms that supply the bulk of produce at farmers markets. After farm expenses, these farm families bring home about $60,000 in annual income, a very small slice of which comes from farm profits.

There are many challenges for urban farms: including issues of scale, labor, distribution and storage (although many of these are not so different than the challenges that face any farm). But we need to recognize that an ability to generate a healthy profit is not a reasonable demand.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

While it’s true that urban land is expensive and its use should be geared toward maximal economic impact, it’s easy to gloss over the fact that investors aren’t falling over themselves to pour money into cities’ neglected and struggling urban cores. These areas simply aren’t about to spontaneously turn into hi-tech meccas. Urban agriculture, when practiced in the intensive style of growing which can yield huge amounts of food on small plots, provides jobs — both for farm workers and tradespeople, skills and a product that doesn’t just go right into urban residents pockets but into their stomachs. It should be viewed as a key component of urban development, not classifed as a hobbyist Yuppie trend.

Originally posted on Beyond Green

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

Tom Laskawy is a founder and executive director of the Food & Environment Reporting Network. His writing on food politics and the environment has appeared online in Grist, The American Prospect, Slate, The New York Times, and The New Republic Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Let's not be too quick to downplay the economic impact of urban agriculture. People who are new to farming around the US and Canada are having success with SPIN-Farming, which is a small plot farming system that outlines how to make money growing in backyards, front lawns and neighborhood lots. SPIN makes it possible to earn $50,000+ from a half acre, which is about 20,000 sq. ft. SPIN farmers utilize relay cropping to increase yield and achieve good economic returns by growing only the most profitable food crops tailored to local markets. SPIN provides everything you'd expect from a good franchise: a business plan, marketing advice, and a detailed day-to-day workflow. In standardizing the system and creating a reproducible process it really isn't any different from McDonalds. By offering a non-technical, easy-to-understand and inexpensive-to-implement farming system, it allows many more people to farm commercially, wherever they live, as long as there are nearby markets to support them. When you factor in spin-off businesses in food processing, urban ag could be an industry of some consequence.

More from

Farm Bill


The exterior of the new Lidl food market in Washington, DC. (Photo credit: Ciara O'Brien)

Can Discount Grocer Lidl Offer Better Food Access in DC’s Ward 7?

The recent opening of the German grocery chain in Southeast DC gives residents a much-needed source for healthy, affordable food. Many hope it will drive other solutions to food insecurity in the under-served area.


These Chicago Urban Farmers Are Growing Local Food in the Wake of Steel Industry Pollution

Xavier “X” Colon, a young person with long braided black hair, a baseball cap, and a bright orange hi-visibility shirt, stands in the fields at South Chicago Farm. (Photo by Paul Gordon)

The Field Report: The Future of Organic Food Is Taking Shape at the USDA—and Beyond

A grower at City Roots Farm in Columbia, S.C., waters the microgreens at the family-owned local organic vegetable farm.

Does Pastoralism Have a Place in the Future of Food?

Ilse-Kohler-Rollefson, a camel, and the cover of the new book, hoofprints on the land

Op-ed: Want an Agtech Revolution? Center Farmworkers’ Expertise