Freeing Hens From Cages Too Important To Delay | Civil Eats

Freeing Hens From Cages Too Important To Delay

A recent Associated Press article about one researcher’s effort to breed “gentler” chickens is getting a lot of attention. Agribusiness representatives have seized the article to defend the cruel practice of confining hens in cages (claiming that most egg-laying hens are, by nature, too aggressive to each other to let them live in a cage-free environment). A closer inspection of the issue leads to a different conclusion. Certainly, studies that lead to improved animal welfare—such as reduced feather-pecking among laying hens—are a positive step. However, the egg industry needn’t wait for new bird strains to exist before working to improve birds’ quality of life.

Currently, the majority of egg-laying hens in the U.S. are confined in cages so small the animals can barely move – let alone spread their wings or engage in other important natural behavior, such as perching, nesting or foraging. Such restrictive confinement takes a physical toll on the birds’ health, leading to osteoporosis and other metabolic disorders.

Well-established scientific research [PDF] shows that cage-free housing offers significant animal welfare advantages compared to cramming animals into cages. As Dr. Bernard Rollin at Colorado State University’s department of animal science has stated: “Research has shown what common sense already knew—that animals built to move must move.”

This is why California and Michigan have outlawed the cage confinement of egg-laying hens, and why dozens of major companies (e.g. Burger King, Wendy’s, Subway, Wal-Mart, Costco and Hellmann’s mayonnaise) have moved toward cage-free eggs.

So what about this research at Purdue on the genetic basis of feather-pecking? Scientists have studied abnormal pecking behavior for years, and now understand that it is multifactorial, with some of the causes including overcrowding, barren environments, and lack of loose litter, in addition to the genetic background of the hen. The behavior is notoriously unpredictable, and it can occur in both cage and cage-free production systems. While efforts to correct this animal welfare problem are certainly commendable, many cage-free producers are already successfully managing their flocks with low mortality rates [PDF]. Providing early access to an enriched environment, with perches and foraging substrate for example, can greatly reduce the probability of an injurious pecking outbreak.

Mortality may be high or low in any type of laying system, depending on how well that system is managed. But the problems associated with cage confinement— including the denial of basic behavioral needs and virtual immobilization—are inherent to battery cages and cannot be mitigated.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

The HSUS supports efforts to improve the lives of animals, including research that may reduce feather-pecking. However, the egg industry need not wait to make critical animal welfare improvements—such as simply allowing birds the freedom to walk and spread their wings. Many cage-free producers are already able to manage their flocks in a way that reduces mortality due to abnormal pecking behavior, and these successful cage-free producers should serve as models for the rest of the industry.

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

Dr. Shields is a consulting scientist in farm animal behavior and welfare for the Humane Society of the United States. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

  1. Paul
    Dr. Shields is right: If the egg industry were serious about wanting to improve animal welfare, the first thing it would do would be to phase out confinement of hens in cages.
  2. Stephen
    The meat industry has a mentality of punishing the victim by injecting, mutilating, confining, and so on, to suppress inconvenient behaviors brought on by torturous conditions. I see genetic manipulation as a further extension of this, where the ultimate goal is a "zombie" animal, a nice compliant meat unit.

    The welfare of animals is secondary to profits in the meat industry--always was, always will be. This too is common sense, as is the conclusion drawn from it that the meat industry cannot be trusted to do the right thing.

    Even if birds are cage free, conditions are still bad and unnatural. There is no escaping that they are still on a factory farm, still living wretched lives, and still destined to be slaughtered when their usefulness has run out.

More from

Animal Ag



Farmers March for Urgent Climate Action in DC

The Rally for Resilience marches to the U.S. Capitol building. Signs at the front read

How the Long Shadow of Racism at USDA Impacts Black Farmers in Arkansas—and Beyond

Arkansas farmer Clem Edmonds sits on his riding mower in Cotton Plant, Arkansas. (Photo by Wesley Brown)

After Centuries of Exploitation, Will Indigenous Communities in Biodiversity Hotspots Finally Get Their Due?

Sailing in a wooden boat on the Amazon river in Peru. An indigenous girl sitting on the front of the boat whilst sailing down the river.

School Food Chefs Learn to Plot Healthier Menus With a New Fellowship

A trio of school chefs working in the kitchen as part of the Healthy School Food Pathways program. (Photos courtesy of the Chef Ann Foundation)