Children in the Victory Garden

This is the final part of our 4-part series on the process of creating Slow Food Nation. See the intro to the series here, Part 1 here, Part 2 here and Part 3 here.

Over the past month, Slow Food Nation has been interviewing and surveying all of the collaborators in the inaugural edition including the team, curators, designers, sponsors, vendors, farmers, food producers and community organizations who built this year’s event. We are gathering the knowledge necessary to make recommendations on the future of Slow Food Nation based on what we learned this year. I hope we’ll be able to announce some concrete next steps with Slow Food USA for the event in the space of a few weeks, but I’d like to share some of the information that we’ve gathered so far.

So much of Slow Food Nation was done with such haste and hurry that it is novel and amazing to have time to reflect, dialogue, and discuss. It’s also great to learn that although the event was hugely ambitious, the vast majority of people we have spoken with feel that an ambitious and highly visible big step was the right choice for this time, this city, and this community. In general, the community feels that an event that requires such great financial and in-kind support needs to happen every two years – like the international events on which Slow Food Nation is broadly modeled. I am pleased that most of the community that built Slow Food Nation agreed that the event needs to move beyond San Francisco for the next edition (the cities of Des Moines and Washington DC came up often in our interviews and discussions). People felt that the city of San Francisco was a natural choice for a first edition, but to build greater impact, the event needed to grow in areas where it could contribute even more to building a food culture, and many of the curators and designers who participated in this first edition volunteered to help advise future in-kind supporters in other cities based on their experiences in the inaugural edition in San Francisco.

I am also learning how much the event was a clear reflection of the city of San Francisco – its mature and vibrant food scene, its incredibly active non-profit community working in food justice, sustainability, and advocacy, and its food-savvy residents. A future event needs to reflect the fabric and color of the community it serves – just as in the city of San Francisco, our event took on the shine, shape and passion of the city. A future event would need to do the same in the city it serves and to build event elements that reflect local food culture and community. That’s why I do not feel like a future event would need to look or feel at all like the inaugural edition – it might take on a completely different scope based on the context of the community it serves.