The Real Picture: Our Team and Resources | Civil Eats

The Real Picture: Our Team and Resources

This is part 3 of our 4-part series on the process of creating Slow Food Nation. See the intro to the series here, Part 1 here and Part 2 here.

When I came on as Executive Director in December 2007, Slow Food Nation had exactly one employee. Our dedicated board chair Katrina Heron provided top-level support, but we were a team of just two staff – our content director Sarah Weiner and myself. We had about $70,000 in the bank, and our biggest assets were a clear idea of what elements the event could be built from, the strong vision of a “good, clean, and fair” food system from Slow Food, and the overarching goal of being a platform for a broader food movement. Although Slow Food USA is our parent organization, they were understandably unable to provide any financial resources or any staff support beyond promotion of the event to their membership and planning the Slow Food Convivium leader’s congress to be held during the event. During the months of planning, many California Slow Food Convivium leaders were huge assets, organizing Slow Journeys, fundraisers and joining the Slow Food Nation team. At the peak of our capacity in June and July, the Slow Food Nation team totaled 32 people (average age of 28), about one-third working for free as full-time staff, all crammed into a 1600 sq ft office. The purpose of this post is to tell a bit more of the story of how we grew from December 2007 to September 2008 – with a focus on funding.

We knew that Slow Food Nation could not evolve into a space for the few – it had to be broad and inclusive – we had to encourage dialogue, discussion, engagement, and participation to make this thing work. I believed that people would ignore Slow Food Nation if we were judgmental and demanding about how they had to participate, or how they had to be in order to be welcome. Too often I had seen Slow Food and other food events not succeed in being inclusive because there was a sense that you already had to be “in the know” about food and food politics to even understand the language of the event. I tested the response to this vision with a few conversations with corporate sponsors, and realized that although some funders were doubtful of our capacity to actually execute such a big and broad event, they were thrilled with the inclusive vision. I was also wary about having too much corporate visibility at the event – we wanted to keep the vibe at Slow Food Nation low-key and not at all reminiscent of a trade show like Fancy Food or the Natural Foods Expo. We wanted to feel polished and smooth, but authentic and real. I felt strongly that it would actually prove to be an asset for our sponsors in the long term to really focus attention on the artisans and food producers instead of directing all eyes towards logos and corporate stands. In general, potential sponsors were excited about the celebratory and inclusive vision, and were happy that this event would not be branded with a message of “do this, not that”. Although I had hoped that we would find a major partner for the whole event – a presenting sponsor who could underwrite the total of $1,000,000+ hard costs we anticipated – we left that hopeful fantasy behind pretty early, and realized that the funding for the event (similar to the content) would be a tapestry of hundreds of different sources, ranging from the purely philanthropic to the totally corporate. In retrospect, having literally hundreds of separated funders along with a few big sponsors was extremely useful for Slow Food Nation – it held us accountable to many different people in may different sectors and made us work to make sure that the event was really delivering economic returns in branding and visibility for the values-driven businesses who are so crucial to building a more sustainable food system.

Our first major funder – Rodale – came through in early spring. At the time, we had still not worked out all the options for visibility, but were starting to think laterally. Instead of a classic “footprint” for an event stand, how about offering “ownership” of a certain area to a top-tier partner? What about offering logo visibility in the website and on event signage? We explored personalized email blasts, collaborative press strategies, and slowly evolved a sponsorship package that offered corporate partners a range of visibility for their investment. More importantly, we really engaged potential partners in a conversation about what we could offer them, and tried to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach to proposals. At the same time, I started conversations with a range of foundations. Grants are not a typical way to finance and event, but because this event was so focused on supporting the non-profit and social change community, as well as delivering strong social returns, many foundations were interested. Grant funding was key to securing funds for a few key staff positions – our Agrarian Arts and Justice programs among them – as well as to funding some specific event elements like Changemakers Day, the Native Foods pavilion, and more.

Basing an event on hundreds of conversations and fragile human networks requires more people and time than a classic event model of selling stands. I learned that by involving so many groups, restaurants, collaborators, etc – so crucial to our mission of serving as a broad platform for the food movement – we also made our planning process rather complicated. Instead of one person sitting down and dreaming up the workshop topics, we invited proposals and received 150, which then needed to be parsed, grouped, synthesized, followed up on, etc. Instead of choosing one type of vinyl and one foamcore to make everything in the event space, we had 25 architects, five builders, and hundreds of collaborators. This pushed up the staff time needed and then the budget numbers up – it seemed (ironically) like the more engagement we encouraged the more money we needed. But a magical shift started to happen around May as the many people we had reached out to involve in the event planning in January and February were stepping up and really owning pieces – solving problems before they happened. More than the funding coming into place, this shift in the collaborative spirit of the event was a clear sign that this event as we had envisioned it was really doable.

The team grew slowly but surely, there were a few months where payroll was rather tight, but by May we had enough guaranteed contracts and sponsors to be confident in reaching budget. Around the same time, we found an incredible event producer—Dominic Phillips Event Marketing (DPEM)—which partnered with us and offering in-kind support and decades of event management experience. DPEM’s role was to execute all of the logistics of the event: rentals, build outs, volunteer management, and more. DPEM came on board after two other events companies told us that what we were trying to do with green building and thousands of products was too complicated. Although DPEM told us recently that they really did not think Slow Food Nation was possible at the start, they said they warmed to us because of the great food in the office, the idealism and enthusiasm, and – most importantly – a real passion for our mission, and for building awareness and understanding of food, health and the environment.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Although we met our targets for fundraising for Slow Food Nation, we certainly did not exceed them. Ticket sales, the sale of Patron’s packages, our victory Garden fundraising dinner, and other efforts were necessary to meet all of the hard costs of the event. I will not have a final amount of profit from the event until early October, but I am confident that there will be sufficient for seed money for a future edition of Slow Food Nation. More importantly, I hope that what we’ve learned about fundraising, and quickly building our small non-profit via diversified revenue and aggressive promotion via in-kind partnerships will be helpful for other organizations. Please be in touch if you are planning (or dreaming) of planning a values-driven, inclusive event and would like to learn more about our process, resources, business plan, or more.

Anya Fernald began her career in food working in rural development in southeastern Sicily developing cooperatives for artisan cheesemakers. She then spent four years working for Slow Food International in Italy, working as the Program Director for the Slow Food Foundation. Anya returned to her home state of California in 2005 to work as Program Director at the Community Alliance with Family Farmers (CAFF). Anya went on leave from CAFF in late 2007 to launch the inaugural edition of Slow Food Nation in San Francisco.

Image: Scene from the tap water station at Slow Food Nation. Photo courtesy of David Gartner.

Today’s food system is complex.

Invest in nonprofit journalism that tells the whole story.

Anya Fernald was most recently Executive Director of Slow Food Nation, and has just launched a new venture - Live Culture Co. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I was at Slow Food Nation and would very much like to learn more about planning a values-driven event!!
  2. Karen Siegel
    I went to a number of the events for Slow Food Nation. Loved the Farm Tour to Bolinas. Learned alot and met some great people. Loved the Food For Thought speaker series on Saturday with Michael Pollan etc. and also appreciated the SF film event.

    The thing that my friends and I were disappointed with was the TASTE event held at Fort Mason. We did not appreciate having to stand in so many long lines (45 min wait for a small taste of charcuterie) and the fact that we were presented with a ticket that had to get signed at each taste experience. We thought, because it was never explained otherwise, that for $65.00 we were going to get to taste all of the different areas at the event. Imagine our surprise when we found out that we were paying $6-9. for each of the tastes, even the pickles, and that if we wanted to taste everything we would have to buy more tickets. And then because of the lines we ended up splitting up and going into different lines so we could taste more things in the time allotted to us. So it was not very convivial. The wine area was particularly disorganized and frustrating to maneuver.

    I am not sure whether SF Nation staff thought people would like the idea of standing "slowly" in a line and having to pay a lot of money to taste a little bit of food, but I heard grumblings from people all over this event and my friends and I said we would not do it again.

    I thought there should have been more literature from the producers also so we could have had something to take away with us to reference what we had tasted.

    Liked the idea of the event and hope you do it again and can learn from the first go around.

More from

General

Featured

Popular

Op-ed: The Loss of My Family’s Farm Is a Loss for California’s Japanese Agricultural Legacy

The Field Report: What the Historic Climate Bill Means for Farmers and the Food System

Flooded fields in winter

Are Criollo Cattle a Regenerative Solution to a 1,200-Year Megadrought?

criollo cattle grazing

22 Solutions-Focused Stories on the Food System in 2022

Abby Barrows pulling up one of her experimental oyster bags made of metal and wood at Long Cove Sea Farm. (Photo credit: Greta Rybus)