<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civil Eats &#187; Lay&#8217;s local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civileats.com/tag/lays-local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civileats.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Remarkable Shift in Food System Debates</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/05/20/a-remarkable-shift-in-food-system-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://civileats.com/2009/05/20/a-remarkable-shift-in-food-system-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmuller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eating Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agribusiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lay's local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Garden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=3666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three recent news articles about manipulative agribusiness actions have me almost giddy with excitement. After years of having agribusiness dictate the direction of the food system, it has now taken a reactionary stance. The first sign of change is from the world’s largest snack-food company, Frito-Lay. They have initiated “Lay’s Local”, which focuses on 80 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three recent news articles about manipulative  agribusiness actions have me almost giddy with excitement. After years of having agribusiness dictate the direction of the food system, it  has now taken a reactionary stance. <span id="more-3666"></span></p>
<p>The first sign of change is from the  world’s largest snack-food company, Frito-Lay. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/13/dining/13local.html" target="_blank">They have initiated  “Lay’s Local”</a>, which focuses on 80 “local” farmers from 27  states. Frito-Lay’s Web site has a <a href="http://www.fritolay.com/lays/chip-tracker.html" target="_blank">Chip  Tracker</a> that allows interested  consumers to enter their zip code and product code in order to find  out where the potatoes came from. Although Frito-Lay can’t claim the  potatoes are locally grown, the advertising campaign hides the corporation  behind the aura of U.S. farmers.</p>
<p>The second is the Ohio Farm Bureau  Federation’s announcement of a newly formed <a href="http://www.farmanddairy.com/news/farm-bureau-center-to-elevate-animal-issues/11998.html" target="_blank">Center for Food and Animal  Issues</a>. The Center’s  strategy appears to be to categorize feedlot operators as just another  group of people that supports animals, just like pet owners, hunters,  supporters of zoos and local animal welfare organizations. “Ultimately,  our goal is to assure that people who rely on animals, either physically,  emotionally or economically, have the right to do so,” said Ohio Farm  Bureau Federation executive vice president Jack Fisher. The impetus  for the Center came after pork, poultry and veal housing legislation  was introduced into state legislatures around the country, and in particular  the passing of California’s Proposition 2, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_2" target="_blank">Prevention of Farm  Animal Cruelty Act</a>.</p>
<p>And finally, <a href="http://www.croplife.com/news/?storyid=1656" target="_blank">CropLife.com</a> has announced a call to action to protest  the planting of an organic garden on the White House lawn. This crop  protection industry organization congratulates First Lady Michelle Obama  for her effort to raise food and celebrate agriculture, but takes issue  with the garden being organic. Their Web site asks “What message does  that send to the non-farming public about an important and integral  part of growing safe and abundant crops to feed and clothe the world  &#8212; crop protection products?”</p>
<p>So why do I get giddy about these typical,  calculated attempts to manipulate public opinion? Because I think about  what we were debating just ten years ago, and how dramatically the conversation  has changed in a positive direction.</p>
<p>Ten years ago the hot issue in the  agriculture world was genetically modified crops. And despite the many  legitimate concerns that were raised about health and environmental  unknowns, as well as the alarming consolidation of the seed industry,  roundup ready soybeans and other genetically modified crops swept across  the Midwest largely unimpeded. Opponents were portrayed as petty reactionaries  that were oblivious to the challenge of “feeding the world”.</p>
<p>The last part of the 1990s was also  a time of incredible devastation in rural America. Crop prices were  reaching depression-era levels, and the promises of the 1996 “Freedom  to Farm” bill were nowhere to be seen. I sat through countless forums  where agribusiness professionals told the farming community to relax,  soon the incredible buying power of China will make low crop prices  a thing of the past. Unfortunately, we spent years with most commodity  prices well below the cost of production, and neither China nor any  other part of the world corrected the situation for us.</p>
<p>Perhaps it was my lack of imagination,  but I never dreamed that we could have possibly made as much progress  toward community-based food systems as we have in the past decade. “Locally  grown” is the hottest food trend for 2009, so hot that a leader in  the corporate snack food industry wants to get in on the act. Ten years  ago, someone concerned about the humane treatment of animals had to  work hard to find acceptable meat and poultry; now the confined livestock  industry is back on its heels because of California’s proposition  2, the excessive use of antibiotics, and continued problems with manure  pollution.</p>
<p>Most remarkable has been the explosion  in interest in gardening and backyard livestock.  The crop protection  industry’s rather lame objection to an organic garden on the White  House lawn reveals the difficult position that the industry is in. Who  can really be against local organic production that is efficient, nutritious  and cost-effective, while at the same time provides exercise and often  builds community?</p>
<p>By no means do I mean to diminish the  challenges ahead of us. As the Frito-Lay campaign demonstrates, we need  to remain vigilant to make sure that words like organic and locally  grown mean what the public thinks it means. Far too many people around  the world and in the U.S. continue to suffer from hunger and diet-related  diseases. But people are no longer willing to let a component of their  lives as critical as the food system rest in the control of agribusiness  corporations.</p>
<p>Many more people are empowered to make  decisions about their family’s food, and a lot of hands are getting  dirty in the fresh spring soil. Instead of us trying to create space  in the corporate food system for alternative food and farming practices,  the agribusiness industry is trying to create space for itself in the  thriving community-based food systems. This is a welcome transition.</p>
<img src="http://civileats.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3666&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://civileats.com/2009/05/20/a-remarkable-shift-in-food-system-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

