Why Farm-to-Institution Sourcing is the Sleeping Giant of Local Food

Strategists are following the money to schools, corporate cafeterias, and hospitals in hopes of rebuilding local economies and bringing healthy food access—literally in through the back door.


The next time someone points to the need for more farmers’ markets as a way to help move local food from a trend to a substantive cultural shift, you might consider telling them about the power of institutional purchasing. It may sound less interesting and, on the surface, it certainly is. (Who doesn’t love buying purple carrots to the sound of a didgeridoo?) But bear with us.

You see, public and private institutions spend billions of dollars each year on food. Schools, universities, hospitals, prisons, corporate cafeterias, and senior care facilities share one thing in common—they prepare, cook, and serve thousands of meals every day. Now, a rising national movement wants to persuade these institutions to source a higher percentage of food from regional producers—with an emphasis on farms, fishermen, and and ranches that follow ecologically sound, socially just, and humane practices. It’s called institutional food procurement, and, while it might not have quite as much romance as some other elements of today’s Good Food Movement, some say this follow-the-money strategy could hold the key to transforming the American food system.

A shift in institutional food buying has the potential for major impacts on not only the local economy, but on food access, according to Amanda Oborne, Vice President of Food and Farms at Ecotrust, an Oregon-based nonprofit that works to advance farm-to-institution initiatives in the Pacific Northwest.

“We put the focus on the buyers with multi-million dollar food procurement budgets because even if they just redirect a couple of percentage points of their budget into the region, that’s going to drive change all the way through the [local] supply chain,” says Oborne. In one example, chefs at Willamette University in Salem, Oregon can order whole hogs from local producers thanks to an innovative partnerships with a meat distribution company.

For Ecotrust, and other farm-to-institution groups across the nation, the goals are two-fold. First, they aim to sway large institutions with huge food budgets to leverage their purchasing power in support of small and mid-sized regional farmers, ranchers, and fisherman as a way to boost the local economies. And to pivot away from consolidated global distributors like Sysco. A second, and just as important goal, is to open up access to healthy, local, and sustainable food for the populations generally served by public institutions.

“A local tomato will provide just as much flavor and nutritive value to a low-income kindergartner as it will to a wealthy hedge fund manager,” says Nessa Richman, Metrics Project Manager with Farm to Institution New England (FINE). “Institutions … feed hundreds of thousands of economically distressed families and individuals every day.”

For the past five years, FINE has worked to connect local food distributors with institutions in the Northeast. Across the six New England states, institutions spend a total of more than $78 million per year on local food and an estimated 3.8 million people eat at institutions served by FINE. The organization has released the first in a series of reports focused on regional food distributors and food hubs—both the opportunities and barriers faced by small and large companies. According to those New England-based distributors FINE surveyed, together they moved over a billion dollars of food in 2012, of which $366 billion was sold to institutions. Nearly 90 percent believed sales of local food to institutions will continue to increase.

The farm-to-institution market holds more power to benefit farmers and fisherman than any other local food market, says Richman.

“When institutions make it a priority to buy local, they can spur unprecedented innovation and investment across the supply chain—and make a significant economic impact,” she says.

Jesse Nichols Stoneboat Farms with Foodservice director tour

Scale Matters

Not all local farms are equipped to sell to institutions.

At 30 acres, Stoneboat Farm in Hillsboro, Oregon qualifies as a small farm. Jesse Nichols, who farms the land with his brother, says his business has benefited from partnerships with institutions. Currently, they supply about $5,000 a month in produce to the chefs at Intel Corporation, just five minutes down the road from the farm. Corporate cafeterias on the campus serve thousands of employees each day.

“Having an institutional client like this is really beneficial and makes things much more streamlined for us,” says Nichols. “It saves us a bunch of deliveries to smaller accounts and makes a big difference in our workloads.”

In the future, Stoneboat Farm would like to move into more institutional partnerships. So far, nascent attempts to connect with school food service programs haven’t resulted in much.

“It’s been difficult to partner with the larger institutions within the farm-to-school movement because of the sheer volume they need,” says Nichols. “You have to think differently to buy local. You have to understand the local climate, be able to expect price and availability fluctuations based on what farmers have available. You have to be flexible. We’re not a big distributor that can have cheap prices all of the time.”

That’s where mid-sized farms enter the picture. According to a new report published by the Union of Concerned Scientists, local purchasing has a huge impact. The study, which centered on Iowa, found that if 25 percent of the 22,000 institutions and “intermediate markets” in the state procured local food, over $800 million annually would be generated for the state’s economy. If at least half of these local purchases came from midsized farms, they would support over 4,259 farms and potentially 12,320 jobs.

Oborne, at Ecotrust, agrees with the importance of supporting midsized farms so that they can be “meaningful” partners to hospitals, schools, and other institutional buyers, and provide consistent quantities of food that institutional food service requires

“It’s that midscale operation that would be ideally suited to building a strong regional food economy,” says Oborne. “They’re a little bigger than the farmers’ market guys with bigger production, and a little more professional operations. Yet, the whole notion of ‘ag-in-the-middle’ in our country has been hollowed out.”

To that end, Ecotrust is in the process of creating an infrastructure hub in Oregon, where midsized farmers can find support for many aspects of their business, from marketing to business planning.

Logistics—mainly to make it smooth for food service directors at institutions to access to local foods—are another challenge.

“[Food service directors] can’t afford the labor to be slicing, dicing, and chopping,” says Oborne. “Their docks won’t allow for 50 different farmers in their own little vehicles to show up at any given time. They need huge volumes, consistently. Even the ones who are hyper-committed don’t really have the bandwidth to deal with these things.”

For this reason, Ecotrust helped to launch the Northwest Food Buyers Alliance, a peer-to-peer network of food service directors from all kinds of institutions: schools, hospitals, higher education, assisted living, corrections, and corporate cafes. Members go on farm and institutional kitchen tours, and meet quarterly to share strategies on how to source locally at institutional levels. Oborne calls these early adopters the “real heroes and champions.”

Swimming Upstream in a Time of Consolidation

Obviously, if institutional food purchasing is going to shift towards sustainable and local purchasing, more work remains. A report from John Hopkins Center for a Livable Future claims that the “vast purchasing power and educational opportunity provided by institutions for assisting in this transition remains to be tapped.”

Why all the untapped potential? According to the report’s authors, the concentration of the food service management market has played a significant role. The largest management companies—Compass Group, Aramark, and Sodexo—operate food services in about 45 percent of all North American institutional food service outlets to the tune of $33 billion in revenue. Food distribution is equally consolidated Sysco and US Foods Inc., the two largest “broadline” food distributors, bring in about $65 billion in combined annual revenue, and dominate 75 percent of the national market. In 2015, the Federal Trade Commission filed an administrative complaint complaining that proposed merger between Sysco and U.S. Foods, Inc. would violate anti-trust laws.

At the same time, the movement to reform institutional food procurement has seen measurable success in both the public and private realms. For example, Bon Appétit Management Co., one of Compass Group’s subsidiaries (and the company that runs the cafe at Willamette University), requires its chefs to buy at least 20 percent of its meat, vegetables, and other products within a 150-mile radius.

On a related note, Pie Ranch, an organic educational farm in California has begin partnering with private clients including Stanford University and Google to provide local produce for their employee meals. At Google alone that translates to daily meals for around 20,000 employees.

In the first installment of this series, we wrote about the Good Food Purchasing Policy in Los Angeles, where the largest public school district in California became the model for how to implement healthy, sustainable, and value-based procurement and serve over 650,000 meals a day. And the Center for Good Food Purchasing, led by Alexa Delwiche, wants to take the proven rigorous institutional food purchasing policy national.

But that’s not where it ends. A number of other schools and other public institutions are working to move the local produce dial. The National Farm to School Network and Healthcare Without Harm have been chipping away at changing institutional food procurement for years. And, last April, Nessa Richman of FINE convened more a dozen farm-to-institution practitioners and advocates from across the country in Washington, D.C. to launch the first national working group around the issue.

“With food system work, we’re swimming upstream on so many things, but I think this effort has the potential to make a giant measurable difference in the relatively near term,” says Ecotrust’s Oborne.

It’s certainly worth a try.

 

Photos by Shawn Linehan. From top: Jesse Nichols of Stoneboat Farm gives the food services directors from Willamette University a tour; Nichols with Andre Uribe, executive chef at Bon Appétit Management Co.’s Willamette University cafe.

Leave a Comment

View Comments

  1. Tuesday, August 30th, 2016
    If consolidation is such an issue, why not look at the numerous self-operated institutions that have been hard at work supporting resilient local food systems for years? At the University of Montana, we’ve increased our purchases of local and sustainable food products every year since 2003, investing over $6.5 million in Montana grown and raised products; $1 million last year alone. Local and sustainable purchases now represent over one-third of our food purchasing budget. And the barriers aren't always as prohibitive as they seem. Scratch cooking might increase labor costs, but it’s also been shown to decrease food costs. Ours has gone down over the past twelve years.
  2. Wednesday, August 31st, 2016
    Excellent article, and certainly food for thought! (npi)
Top