<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Organic Versus Conventional Food: UK Report Flawed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do I dare to eat a peach? Not a conventional one, says Tribune study :: The Ethicurean: Chew the right thing.</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3866</link>
		<dc:creator>Do I dare to eat a peach? Not a conventional one, says Tribune study :: The Ethicurean: Chew the right thing.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3866</guid>
		<description>[...] responses from organic defenders, including The Organic Center, and commentary from Grist and Civil Eats among others. Many cited studies countering the UK finding: Organic food has more antioxidants; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] responses from organic defenders, including The Organic Center, and commentary from Grist and Civil Eats among others. Many cited studies countering the UK finding: Organic food has more antioxidants; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It was a flawed study: organic does have more nutrients &#171; Question Everything</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator>It was a flawed study: organic does have more nutrients &#171; Question Everything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3864</guid>
		<description>[...] Organic Versus Conventional Food: UK Report Flawed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Organic Versus Conventional Food: UK Report Flawed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Local Beet: Chicago &#187; Another Go At Linky Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3829</link>
		<dc:creator>The Local Beet: Chicago &#187; Another Go At Linky Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3829</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot closer to the organic of today, negating the ability to look at these things over time.  Paula at Civil Eats has both of those criticisms as well as a whole lot more to show that maybe, well, in fact, organic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot closer to the organic of today, negating the ability to look at these things over time.  Paula at Civil Eats has both of those criticisms as well as a whole lot more to show that maybe, well, in fact, organic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>The FSA has a reputation in the UK for being anti-organic and pro-GM and its latest report has done nothing to dispel this. 

Basically we need MORE research on the nutritional differences - not a biased summing up of existing studies. 

Here is my blog on the subject http://bit.ly/5ViFk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FSA has a reputation in the UK for being anti-organic and pro-GM and its latest report has done nothing to dispel this. </p>
<p>Basically we need MORE research on the nutritional differences &#8211; not a biased summing up of existing studies. </p>
<p>Here is my blog on the subject <a href="http://bit.ly/5ViFk" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5ViFk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles Bedroom Furniture</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3802</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles Bedroom Furniture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3802</guid>
		<description>keep in mind that those reports are completely biased towards big corporations who only have their own best interests in mind.  they hire big PR firms to represent them in a good light and it blinds us consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep in mind that those reports are completely biased towards big corporations who only have their own best interests in mind.  they hire big PR firms to represent them in a good light and it blinds us consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Feed</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>News Feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>[...] Organic foods no more nutritious than &#8220;ordinary?&#8221; The internet is abuzz with the results of a report which is being widely reported to have shown organic food to have no greater nutritional value than conventional.  But hold the press &#8212; in reviewing 5o years worth of research, the authors apparently left out the results of several studies which showed higher nutrient levels in organics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Organic foods no more nutritious than &#8220;ordinary?&#8221; The internet is abuzz with the results of a report which is being widely reported to have shown organic food to have no greater nutritional value than conventional.  But hold the press &#8212; in reviewing 5o years worth of research, the authors apparently left out the results of several studies which showed higher nutrient levels in organics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Organic vs. Conventional Produce Smack Down! (Poll) &#124; Summer Tomato - Upgrade Your Healthstyle &#124; Healthy Eating Tips</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>Organic vs. Conventional Produce Smack Down! (Poll) &#124; Summer Tomato - Upgrade Your Healthstyle &#124; Healthy Eating Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>[...] Organic Versus Conventional Food: UK Report Flawed by Paula Crossfield at Civil Eats. This is the best analysis I have found. If you only have time to read one article of criticism, make it this one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Organic Versus Conventional Food: UK Report Flawed by Paula Crossfield at Civil Eats. This is the best analysis I have found. If you only have time to read one article of criticism, make it this one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Eat Organic? &#171; Drink of Water</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3782</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Eat Organic? &#171; Drink of Water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3782</guid>
		<description>[...] the British Sunday Times gives a good overview of the study and what its critics say, as does this Civil Eats blog post.  Basically the study acknowledges that existing research demonstrates that organic fruits and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the British Sunday Times gives a good overview of the study and what its critics say, as does this Civil Eats blog post.  Basically the study acknowledges that existing research demonstrates that organic fruits and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>Two Points.

Science needs to be in the service of the land.
Not the chemical industry. The Doctors who analyzed
the statistics are shut ins. The university supports
the big chemical money.

Two. If you ever had a garden you know this report is full of weeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Points.</p>
<p>Science needs to be in the service of the land.<br />
Not the chemical industry. The Doctors who analyzed<br />
the statistics are shut ins. The university supports<br />
the big chemical money.</p>
<p>Two. If you ever had a garden you know this report is full of weeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/07/30/organic-versus-conventional-food-uk-report-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-3774</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=4547#comment-3774</guid>
		<description>I think Hirschberg&#039;s article over at Huffinton post does a good job of highlighting some of the points you&#039;re making up above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Hirschberg&#8217;s article over at Huffinton post does a good job of highlighting some of the points you&#8217;re making up above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
