<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop the Hysteria! A Closer Look at HR 875</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>I was feeling a lot like the HYPE was too much. http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html then some more sane political analysis came across my desk and made me rethink a bit (http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html).  It may or may not be a grand conspiracy, but someone is working really hard to get some version of this bill passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was feeling a lot like the HYPE was too much. <a href="http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html</a> then some more sane political analysis came across my desk and made me rethink a bit (<a href="http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/04/food-safety-legislation-and-grand.html</a>).  It may or may not be a grand conspiracy, but someone is working really hard to get some version of this bill passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2647</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2647</guid>
		<description>click my name above for an idea on more sensible legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>click my name above for an idea on more sensible legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Sabo</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Sabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2643</guid>
		<description>All of the &quot;paranoia&quot; could be cleared up if an amendment was added specifically excluding home gardens, small producers, or markets.

Why this hasn&#039;t been done with the information presented is beyond my understanding, but then I am just &quot;Jane Average&quot; out here.

Once an &quot;all encompassing&quot; Bill is passed into Law it becomes difficult to change the Language presented - therefore just include the exclusion, look like the &quot;good guys&quot; and go forward.

After all - who are the Legislators looking out for if not the American Citizens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the &#8220;paranoia&#8221; could be cleared up if an amendment was added specifically excluding home gardens, small producers, or markets.</p>
<p>Why this hasn&#8217;t been done with the information presented is beyond my understanding, but then I am just &#8220;Jane Average&#8221; out here.</p>
<p>Once an &#8220;all encompassing&#8221; Bill is passed into Law it becomes difficult to change the Language presented &#8211; therefore just include the exclusion, look like the &#8220;good guys&#8221; and go forward.</p>
<p>After all &#8211; who are the Legislators looking out for if not the American Citizens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 04:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2637</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust any congress or senate member who&#039;s husband is a political strategist. He probably made millions off Monsanto&#039;s making sure his wife introduced this bill. In fact, that women should be removed from her public service job for being in direct relation to her Husbands business. Basically, he makes money making from companies who want bills passed, and his wife brings them to fruition. 

Everyone should be suspicious of any group like &quot;Food and Water Watch&quot;, we don&#039;t know who started those organizations, or who funds them, or who could have infultrated into them.

Greenpeace is the only organization that I trust at this point, the rest can prove themselves to the public for all I am concerned. 

Lets just put it this way, some power hungery company like Monsanto tries to take our rights away in growing our own food, there will be an uprising so big, so powerful, and so against that evil company, they will be lucky if they are still considered a viable force in the food industry. 

And it will be like that, I know too many people, and all are against Monsanto. The word is getting around fast, along with fluoridation, aspartame (Monsanto poison), etc....People know what is going on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust any congress or senate member who&#8217;s husband is a political strategist. He probably made millions off Monsanto&#8217;s making sure his wife introduced this bill. In fact, that women should be removed from her public service job for being in direct relation to her Husbands business. Basically, he makes money making from companies who want bills passed, and his wife brings them to fruition. </p>
<p>Everyone should be suspicious of any group like &#8220;Food and Water Watch&#8221;, we don&#8217;t know who started those organizations, or who funds them, or who could have infultrated into them.</p>
<p>Greenpeace is the only organization that I trust at this point, the rest can prove themselves to the public for all I am concerned. </p>
<p>Lets just put it this way, some power hungery company like Monsanto tries to take our rights away in growing our own food, there will be an uprising so big, so powerful, and so against that evil company, they will be lucky if they are still considered a viable force in the food industry. </p>
<p>And it will be like that, I know too many people, and all are against Monsanto. The word is getting around fast, along with fluoridation, aspartame (Monsanto poison), etc&#8230;.People know what is going on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2631</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2631</guid>
		<description>Farmer Pete,

I&#039;ve done my best with 875 on my blog (http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/03/food-safety-modernization-act-another.html) here and several other posts.  HR 759 is still in process.  There doesn&#039;t seem to be much effort on this one.  Think the Trojan Horse is working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmer Pete,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done my best with 875 on my blog (<a href="http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/03/food-safety-modernization-act-another.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.robertsroostecofarm.com/2009/03/food-safety-modernization-act-another.html</a>) here and several other posts.  HR 759 is still in process.  There doesn&#8217;t seem to be much effort on this one.  Think the Trojan Horse is working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmer Pete</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmer Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>Alan, thanks for the tip on HR 875 and HR 759. I haven&#039;t been able to find a thorough review of 759 as I found for 875 (reported above). But I did find a brief comparison of all the proposed food safety bills: HR 759, 814, 875 and S 425, and S 510 at
http://www.ftcldf.org/aa/aa-14mar2009.htm
They say &quot;Small sustainable farms are fundamentally different from factory farms, and should not be regulated the same way! All of the proposed food safety bills suffer from a &quot;one-size-fits-all&quot; approach.&quot;

Also, it kinda bothers me that Food and Water Watch are backers of HR 875; anyone have reason to be suspicious of that group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, thanks for the tip on HR 875 and HR 759. I haven&#8217;t been able to find a thorough review of 759 as I found for 875 (reported above). But I did find a brief comparison of all the proposed food safety bills: HR 759, 814, 875 and S 425, and S 510 at<br />
<a href="http://www.ftcldf.org/aa/aa-14mar2009.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftcldf.org/aa/aa-14mar2009.htm</a><br />
They say &#8220;Small sustainable farms are fundamentally different from factory farms, and should not be regulated the same way! All of the proposed food safety bills suffer from a &#8220;one-size-fits-all&#8221; approach.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, it kinda bothers me that Food and Water Watch are backers of HR 875; anyone have reason to be suspicious of that group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>Food Safety Regulations - Trojan Horse
I&#039;m being told that H.R. 875, The Food Safety Modernization Act, is not going to pass. I shouldn&#039;t worry about it. Apparently the bill that has the best chance of passing is H.R. 759, The Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act. It is in committee now. It is much harder to get a handle on. Much of it is written as amendments to Title 21 of Federal Code. That makes it pretty tough for a non-lawyer like me to wade through it and figure out what it means. There is a section dealing with Safety Standards for Fresh Produce that makes me think small farmers who &quot;process&quot; produce on farm should be concerned with this bill as well.

Here is the text of that section.

SEC. 104. SAFETY STANDARDS FOR FRESH PRODUCE.

(a) PROHIBITED ACT.—Section 301 (21 U.S.C. 331), as amended by sections 102 and 103, is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(pp) The production or harvesting of produce not in accordance with minimum standards as provided by regulation under section 419A(a) or a variance issued under section 419A(e).’’.

(b) STANDARDS.—Chapter IV (21 U.S.C. 341 et seq.), as amended by sections 102 and 103, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SEC. 419A. STANDARDS FOR PRODUCE SAFETY.

‘‘(a) STANDARDS.—The Secretary shall establish by regulation science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities for which the Secretary has determined that such standards minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death.

‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—The regulations under subsection

(a)—‘‘(1) shall set forth such procedures, processes, and practices as the Secretary determines to be reasonably necessary—‘‘(A) to prevent the introduction of known or reasonably foreseeable biological, chemical,

12 and physical hazards, including hazards that

13 occur naturally, may be unintentionally intro14

duced, or may be intentionally introduced, in15

cluding by acts of terrorism, into fruits and

16 vegetables that are raw agricultural commod17

ities; and ‘‘(B) to provide reasonable assurances that the produce is not adulterated under section 402;

‘‘(2) shall include, with respect to growing, harvesting, packing, sorting, and storage operations, minimum standards for safety;

‘‘(3) shall include standards addressing manure use, water quality, employee hygiene, sanitation and animal control, temperature controls, and nutrients; ‘‘(4) may include standards for such other elements as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out subsection (a);

‘‘(5) shall provide a reasonable period of time for compliance, taking into account the needs of small businesses for additional time to comply; and ‘‘(6) shall provide for coordination of education and enforcement activities by State and local officials, as designated by the Governors of the respective States.

‘‘(c) PRIORITIZATION.—The Secretary shall prioritize the implementation the regulations under subsection (a) for specific fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities and have been associated with food-borne illness outbreaks. ‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.—The Secretary may coordinate with the Secretary of Agriculture and shall contract and coordinate with the agency or department designated by the Governor of each State to perform activities to ensure compliance with this section.’’.


I&#039;ll keep working my way through this as best I can and as time allows. I&#039;d appreciate feedback from others who have looked at it from a small farm perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Food Safety Regulations &#8211; Trojan Horse<br />
I&#8217;m being told that H.R. 875, The Food Safety Modernization Act, is not going to pass. I shouldn&#8217;t worry about it. Apparently the bill that has the best chance of passing is H.R. 759, The Food and Drug Administration Globalization Act. It is in committee now. It is much harder to get a handle on. Much of it is written as amendments to Title 21 of Federal Code. That makes it pretty tough for a non-lawyer like me to wade through it and figure out what it means. There is a section dealing with Safety Standards for Fresh Produce that makes me think small farmers who &#8220;process&#8221; produce on farm should be concerned with this bill as well.</p>
<p>Here is the text of that section.</p>
<p>SEC. 104. SAFETY STANDARDS FOR FRESH PRODUCE.</p>
<p>(a) PROHIBITED ACT.—Section 301 (21 U.S.C. 331), as amended by sections 102 and 103, is amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(pp) The production or harvesting of produce not in accordance with minimum standards as provided by regulation under section 419A(a) or a variance issued under section 419A(e).’’.</p>
<p>(b) STANDARDS.—Chapter IV (21 U.S.C. 341 et seq.), as amended by sections 102 and 103, is amended by adding at the end the following:</p>
<p>‘‘SEC. 419A. STANDARDS FOR PRODUCE SAFETY.</p>
<p>‘‘(a) STANDARDS.—The Secretary shall establish by regulation science-based minimum standards for the safe production and harvesting of those types of fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities for which the Secretary has determined that such standards minimize the risk of serious adverse health consequences or death.</p>
<p>‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—The regulations under subsection</p>
<p>(a)—‘‘(1) shall set forth such procedures, processes, and practices as the Secretary determines to be reasonably necessary—‘‘(A) to prevent the introduction of known or reasonably foreseeable biological, chemical,</p>
<p>12 and physical hazards, including hazards that</p>
<p>13 occur naturally, may be unintentionally intro14</p>
<p>duced, or may be intentionally introduced, in15</p>
<p>cluding by acts of terrorism, into fruits and</p>
<p>16 vegetables that are raw agricultural commod17</p>
<p>ities; and ‘‘(B) to provide reasonable assurances that the produce is not adulterated under section 402;</p>
<p>‘‘(2) shall include, with respect to growing, harvesting, packing, sorting, and storage operations, minimum standards for safety;</p>
<p>‘‘(3) shall include standards addressing manure use, water quality, employee hygiene, sanitation and animal control, temperature controls, and nutrients; ‘‘(4) may include standards for such other elements as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out subsection (a);</p>
<p>‘‘(5) shall provide a reasonable period of time for compliance, taking into account the needs of small businesses for additional time to comply; and ‘‘(6) shall provide for coordination of education and enforcement activities by State and local officials, as designated by the Governors of the respective States.</p>
<p>‘‘(c) PRIORITIZATION.—The Secretary shall prioritize the implementation the regulations under subsection (a) for specific fruits and vegetables that are raw agricultural commodities and have been associated with food-borne illness outbreaks. ‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.—The Secretary may coordinate with the Secretary of Agriculture and shall contract and coordinate with the agency or department designated by the Governor of each State to perform activities to ensure compliance with this section.’’.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep working my way through this as best I can and as time allows. I&#8217;d appreciate feedback from others who have looked at it from a small farm perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farmer Pete</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2620</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmer Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2620</guid>
		<description>Your statement is incorrect that missing from the criticisms of HR 875 was &quot;endorsement from a reputable environmental or food organization.&quot;. You must have missed the review by The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund. Their review is very critical of the bill. Their summary of the bill is the best and most complete I&#039;ve seen yet. And they describe a lot more to fear about this bill than what you list above. See it at: http://www.ftcldf.org/news/news-02mar2009.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement is incorrect that missing from the criticisms of HR 875 was &#8220;endorsement from a reputable environmental or food organization.&#8221;. You must have missed the review by The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund. Their review is very critical of the bill. Their summary of the bill is the best and most complete I&#8217;ve seen yet. And they describe a lot more to fear about this bill than what you list above. See it at: <a href="http://www.ftcldf.org/news/news-02mar2009.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftcldf.org/news/news-02mar2009.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>Good post. Nice to read this. I do think we should continue to voice our concerns and opinions to our congressional representatives about food saftey so that standards are implemented that support small farms. GAP certification is one way that food safety goes wrong, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Nice to read this. I do think we should continue to voice our concerns and opinions to our congressional representatives about food saftey so that standards are implemented that support small farms. GAP certification is one way that food safety goes wrong, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashland Food Co-op - Blog &#187; HR 875: Stop the Hysteria</title>
		<link>http://civileats.com/2009/03/24/stop-the-hysteria-a-closer-look-at-hr-875/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashland Food Co-op - Blog &#187; HR 875: Stop the Hysteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civileats.com/?p=2744#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>[...] Before you lose any more sleep over the fear of having federal agents raid your backyard tomato patch or shut down your local farmers market, you should read this blog posting from Civil Eats. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Before you lose any more sleep over the fear of having federal agents raid your backyard tomato patch or shut down your local farmers market, you should read this blog posting from Civil Eats. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

